First of all, let me admit that I consider every citizen of our country,
- who tries to raise the issue of Kashmir at international forums
- who says that India should talk to Pakistan on Kashmir
- who says that the present Kashmiri population (which killed, raped and expelled Kashmiri Hindus) has right to self determination
- who says that security forces should be removed from Kashmir
- who says that Kashmiri protestors are peace loving
as a traitor of the country.
One such person is Rajinder Sachar, who fits the bill.
RAJINDER 'JAICHAND' SACHAR
Yes. The same Sachar, who is Justice Rajinder Sachar, the author of 'Sachar report'.
With the arrest of Ghulam Nabi Fai by America's FBI, we have come to know that Rajinder Sachar, the man behind the doctored report called 'Sachar report' had been hobnobbing with Fai. Interestingly Fai has been arrested for being the front man of Pakistan's ISI.
That should tell us the extent upto which our national security has been compromised and the kind of persons who are in positions to dictate our national policies.
Although he can not be tried for treason or sedition because the plea he will take is 'I did not know his ISI links', as he has already told the media.What is worth pondering is that he has been a judge of our courts. Can such a guy be so naive or gullible?
Analyze his statement:
He also claimed that it was due to his presence, Fai was not able to pursue anti-India agenda during the meet and the resolution adopted during the meet was changed.
Huh.
His presence forced Fai to change his 'anti India' stance!
Let us take his statement at face value.
What conclusion can we draw. One, that our 'justice Sachar' learnt about his anti India stance. If he knew it before hand, he was under no compulsion to go and provide legitimacy to his anti national activities. Two, if he had come to know his stance during the conference, then did he take necessary steps to inform the security agencies or used his connections in the government and with Antonia aka Sonia G to put an end to such nefarious activities.
Now we know that he did neither of them. He enjoyed the hospitality of ISI, made the right kind of noises, basked in the glory of being invited by white men, returned and slept.
That was in 2008.
Then he woke up and was again at his conference in 2010.
A gap of three years. During which the ISI agent had still been pursuing the same Pak centric and Anti India agenda. Our 'justice' still went there.
So, he is trying to befool ordinary citizens, who do not suspect such high level of indiscretion.
If some poor person falls for the bait of free travel to America and stay in plush hotels, we can attribute it to a hunger for money. But this guy is a retired judge. Not a poor soul. So, let us not fall for the crap that it was attraction of free foreign junket.
The FBI says that ISI decided the guest list of gatherings organized by Fai. That should lead us to the question; Why did he zero in on the likes of Rajinder Sachar? Why not some leader of Kashmiri Pandits?
The answer is simple; ISI knows who will talk on the lines that they want. ISI has the plans for disintegration of our country. For this aim, they need 'ghar ke bhedi' or 'Jaichands'. Unfortunately, we have plenty of them. Handpicked by Antonia. For the top posts.
ABU SALEH SHAREEF
When in March of 2005, the UPA government issued a notification regarding setting up of a seven member committee for the purpose of preparing a report on social, economic and educational status of Muslims, it was a major step against the secular principles which UPA spokesmen keep on hollering about. It was a blatantly communal move to appease one community. The member secretary of this committee was Abu Saleh Shareef. A member of NAC, which has devised the divisive 'prevention of communal and targeted violence bill'.
The draconian provisions of the bill can be read in the post titled Inquisition comes knocking, again, to get a better idea. This is in continuation to the discussion about the kind of persons behind the divisive 'prevention of communal and targeted violence bill'. We have already discussed John Dayal, Ram Puniyani, Hosbet Suresh, Kamal Farooqui, Teesta Setalvad, Harsh Mander, Syed Shahaubuddin and Shabnam Hashmi. In this post we will talk about Syed Shahabuddin also known as 'Shah Bano Syed'. The reason of this name is explained in the post.
No prizes for guessing the leanings of this man also.
In his capacity of being member secretary of 'Sachar committee', he had demanded from the Army, the percentage of Muslims employed with the force. The response of the Army is worth reading:
“The Indian Army has an apolitical character in which people from all communities and regions work together without any distinction on the basis of caste, creed and religion. The nationalistic representation and all India character of the Army has been most admirable and acknowledged by all sections of Indian society. That’s why all segments of the country have appreciated Army’s contribution in the Nation. The most important factor for achievement by the Indian Army is because of its group cohesion and camaraderie without any concern for caste, creed or religion.”
“Therefore, data relating to various castes or religions is not maintained in the Army and it will also not be proper to collect or collate such data.”
Befittingly, this reply was addressed to this member secretary of the committee, Abu Saleh Shareef.
For someone with some self respect, that should have shaken him up. But then army is no match for such home grown adversary, who have the morals of an alley cat and appear to be 'one of our own'. The correspondence was leaked to the media and an impression was created that the army is a biased institution.
That is how the present regime is out to damage the moral of our security agencies.
Anyway, the report was submitted in 2006, in less then two years. The data was doctored to show that the Muslims were backwards even in comparison to SC and STs.
Once the report had been drummed up, now it was time for the next step. Subverting the constitution and asserting the demand for religion based reservations.
In 2010, Syed Shahabuddin conducted a gathering of leading Muslims. Abu Saleh Shareef was on the dias. His statement was:
We have to make concrete and constant efforts to turn our demand of reservation for Muslims into reality. Today Muslims are one of the most backward and unprivileged sections of our country as clearly noted by Sachar Committee report. Hence, it is the duty of government to provide reservations to Muslims
See.
The perfect crime.
Make so much of noise that lie is accepted as truth. Of course, equally subservient media is there to help spread the canard.
All in the name of a 'social' and 'secular' cause. One look at the government data is sufficient to prove that the poor Hindus have been deliberately ignored on all major counts to show that they are better placed then Muslims.
Like our two guys, the church fathers were also very inventive in their approach. One example is the FIRE TORTURE which was inflicted on the 'heretics'.
See the two holes in the back of the chair. The 'heretic's' feet were passed through the holes to immobilize him. Then animal fat was rubbed on his feet and the feet were set on fire. In the name of religion. So much for the religions of love.
Still they want us to believe the non sense that 'ALL RELIGIONS ARE SAME'.
