ANNA: What a mess you have made

So, Anna, you have decided to change your symbol. And you have done it on request of Kavita Krishnan, Nandini Ojha and others. As one of many citizens of our country, who whole heartedly supported your satyagrah and also sat on fast for two days in Chandigarh, I would share some information with you.

Kavita Krishnan is the secretary of CPI (Marxist Leninst) (Liberation). That is right friends; communist party of India. First of all she is an all out political outfit. So, she should have been treated with the same disdain as Chautala and Uma Bharti for being politicians.

As far as her nationalism is concerned, she was in the forefront of protests against our security forces when stone pelting Jihadis were giving a tough time to our jawans. She wants "democratic aspirations of Kashmiri people who are resisting brutal repression by Indian troopers". Democratic aspirations should be read as Azad Kashmir which the fanatic sunni muslims want after they have ousted 4,00,000 Kashmiri pandits. Being Marxists means no rights of Hindus. Thanks to our brave soldiers who are facing the fanatic stone pelters but they can not match the wickedness and double speak which these marxists are possessed with.

But then CPI (ML) is not a regular political outfit. It is very very special. Here is an excerpt from its manifesto:

To accomplish people's democratic revolution in a vast and complex country like India, a communist party has to be especially skillful in mastering and combining various forms of struggle and every available avenue of work. The Party therefore strives to develop a comprehensive revolutionary practice through an organic combination of illegal and legal, secret and open and extra-parliamentary and parliamentary forms of struggle and organisation.

Anna dada, do you know all this or have you been taken for a ride.

I do not know who this Nandini Ojha is but let us talk about others who objected to Bharat Mata, that is my mother alongwith billions of others as communal.

One of them is Antonia Maino a.k.a. Sonia Gandhi's pet poodle Harsh Mander raising this issue. According to him:

symbols and allies that the campaign chose disturbed me: the stage was decorated with a picture of Bharat Mata, almost identical to that propagated by the right-wing RSS.

Can you think of more perverted mentality. Bharat Mata is to be rejected and not revered. And what is the cause of rejection? 

Then he says that he did not participate because of two Godmen Swami Ramdev and Shri Shri Ravi shankar because they had maximum supporters. What else are spiritual leaders supposed to do if not ask their followers to stand up for a noble cause? And again he has this allergy to only Hindu religious leaders although they do not discriminate between different religions. Swami Ramdev has been to Deobandh and Muslim clerics have been visiting his rallies as well as his Patanjali Yogpeeth. Still this former IAS officer of dubious service record finds them to be communal but presence of Archbishop Vincent Concessao does not switch on his revulsion.

Don't be surprised. He is on the payrolls of British entity called ActionAid India, which is a foreign policy instrument of Britain. AAI has undertaken

a study to examine the social, economic and educational conditions of Muslims…..as a means to mobilise and encourage the general public, civil society activists and organisations working on issues related to the Muslim community, to become more sensitised to the dismal economic, educational and social conditions of the Muslim masses.

Sounds pretty noble. Let us look at a few hard facts. Muslim population in truncated Bhaarat was about 9.9% which had increased to more then 14% in 2001 and would be around 16% in 2011 census. Add the number of Bangladeshi infiltrators and you might find it more then 20% of the population. On the other hand look at the plight of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Their percentage has fallen from 28% in 1941 to just 9% in 2001 in Bangladesh and in Pakistan the situation is even more pitiable where the drop has been from 20% before partition to just 1.6% in 2001. How many murders, forced conversions, rapes and abductions resulted in this decline can only be imagined. The Action aid of Britain has no agenda of undertaking such encouragement plans for Hindus in Islamic countries. That should give you an idea of the intentions of these rascals.

Then there is a magsaysay award winner Sandeep Pandey. Here are his views:

He critiqued the growing military and 'counter-terrorism' collaboration between India, Israel and the United States, as well as the manufacturing of the image of Muslims as 'terrorists' which global powers are propagating so assidously in order, among other things, to boost their weapons industries.

Is it not interesting? Read every word of this Magsaysay award winner. He is criticizing counter terrorism collaboration between India (Hindu Kafirs), Israel (Jew kaafirs) and U.S. (Christian Kaafirs). Exactly what all the Jihadi fundamentalists say. 

That is not all. This Sandeep Pandey attended the Naxalite conference of kavita Krishnan's CPI (ML) Liberation and this is what he said:

Renowned NAPM activist and Magassassay Award winner Sandeep Pandey stressed the need of unity of revolutionary communist organisations like CPI(ML) and social movements to take on fascist danger.

So much for Gandhian thoughts. That is not all. He had a talk and Q&A session with AID (Association for India's development). Do not go by the name because it is a misnomer. This AID helped finance the famed 'peace march' of Sandeep Pandey between India and Pakistan. One of the supporting organizations was 'Pakistan American Alliance'. How much PEACE they want with India can be seen from this picture that was on the website of Pakistan American Alliance.

ALLAH WILL DESTROY THE TERRORIST STATE OF INDIA

Dear Anna, When you added the clause of two Magsaysay award winners to be on the Lokayukta panel, did you know the truth of magsaysay award donors and its recipients?
If no, then you do not deserve to be my leader and if yes, you are as contemptible as the politicians whom you are holding in contempt.

Ramon Magsaysay award is in the name of an Asian but is controlled by Ford foundation. The awards have a politics of their own. It is generally given to those, who are in line with the thinking of the award giving organization. The awards and prizes have to be earned.
The prize is not given to anyone who does good work. One has to lobby and network for these awards. There is an entire set of machinisations involved in these awards and the hidden agenda is generally a matter of conjecture.

So, either make a public apology to the nation and Swami Ramdev, who brought you to the national limelight or we know that there is something very seriously wrong with you.

If you remove the symbol of Bharat Mata from the backdrop, then either you are a loser pretending to be tough or you are also one of the anti national monsters of your company. Here I have deliberately refrained from commenting on Agnivesh. He is even more deplorable then all these sidekicks you have there.
When Amitabh Bachchan (quoting the beautiful lines written by his dad Harivansh Rai Bachchan) wrote that

मैं हूँ उनके साथ खड़ी जो सीधी रखते अपनी रीढ़

I endorsed him fully. But your action of agreeing to remove the image of Bharat Mata from the backdrop on the insistence of bunch of anti nationalists has compelled me to change my views regarding your spine. This puts you in the category of an octopus, who neither has a spine and can change colors according to his surroundings.

Talk to me Anna.

Oath of the Jesuits - 2

After the superior has spoken about the dastardly deeds that the postulant has been doing and was trained to do, now we come to the main part of the depravity. Since it is an oath taking ceremony, let us look at the oath which is taken by these Jesuits.

I_______________ , now in the presence of Almighty God, the blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the saints, sacred host of Heaven, and to you, my Ghostly Father, the superior general of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola, in the pontification of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the Virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear that His Holiness, the Pope, is Christ's Vice-Regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by the virtue of the keys of binding and loosing given to His Holiness by my Saviour, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical Kings, Princes, States, Commonwealths, and Governments, and they may be safely destroyed.
Therefore to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine and His Holiness's right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, and the now pretended authority and Churches of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now established in Ireland and on the continent of America and elsewhere and all adherents in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. I do now denounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or State, named Protestant or Liberal, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or officers. I do further declare the doctrine of the Churches of England and Scotland of the Calvinists, Huguenots, and others of the name of Protestants or Masons to be damnable, and they themselves to be damned who will not forsake the same.
I do further declare that I will help, assist, and advise all or any of His Holiness's agents, in any place where I should be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Ireland or America, or in any other kingdom or territory I shall come to, and do my utmost to extirpate the heretical Protestant or Masonic doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, legal or otherwise. I do further promise and declare that, notwithstanding, I am dispensed with to assume any religion heretical for the propagation of the Mother Church's interest; to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from time to time, as they entrust me, and not to divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstances whatever; but to execute all that should be proposed, given in charge, or discovered unto me by you, my Ghostly Father, or any of this sacred order.
I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ. That I will go to any part of the world whithersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions north, jungles of India, to the centres of civilisation of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things, whatsoever is communicated to me. I do further promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly and openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Masons, as I am directed to do, to extirpate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex nor condition, and that will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics;

rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infants' heads against the walls in order to annihilate their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly I will secretly use the poisonous cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honour, rank, dignity or authority of the persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agents of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Father of the Society of Jesus. 

In confirmation of which I hereby dedicate my life, soul, and all corporal powers, and with the dagger which I now receive I will subscribe my name written in my blood in testimony thereof; and should I prove false, or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the militia of the Pope cut off my hands and feet and my throat from ear to ear, my belly be opened and sulphur burned therein with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth, and my soul shall be tortured by demons in eternal hell forever. That I will in voting always vote for a Knight of Columbus in preference to a Protestant, especially a Mason, and that I will leave my party so to do; that if two Catholics are on the ticket I will satisfy myself which is the better supporter of Mother Church and vote accordingly. That I will not deal with or employ a Protestant if in my power to deal with or employ a Catholic.
That I will place Catholic girls in Protestant families that a weekly report may be made of the inner movements of the heretics. That I will provide myself with arms and ammunition that I may be in readiness when the word is passed, or I am commanded to defend the Church either as an individual or with the militia of the Pope. All of which I,_______________, do swear by the blessed Trinity and blessed sacrament which I am now to receive to perform and on part to keep this my oath. In testimony hereof, I take this most holy and blessed sacrament of the Eucharist and witness the same further with my name written with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and seal in the face of this holy sacrament.

(He receives the wafer from the Superior and writes his name with the point of his dagger dipped in his own blood taken from over his heart.)

Over to stage three of the oath taking ceremony

(Superior speaks:)

You will now rise to your feet and I will instruct you in the Catechism necessary to make yourself known to any member of the Society of Jesus belonging to this rank. In the first place, you, as a Brother Jesuit, will with another mutually make the ordinary sign of the cross as any ordinary Roman Catholic would; then one crosses his wrists, the palms of his hands open, and the other in answer crosses his feet, one above the other; the first points with forefinger of the right hand to the centre of the palm of the left, the other with the forefinger of the left hand points to the centre of the palm of the right; the first then with his right hand makes a circle around his head, touching it; the other then with the forefinger of his left hand touches the left side of his body just below his heart; the first then with his right hand draws it across the throat of the other, and the latter then with a dagger down the stomach and abdomen of the first. The first then says Iustum; and the other answers Necar; the first Reges; the other answers Impious. The first will then present a small piece of paper folded in a peculiar manner, four times, which the other will cut longitudinally and on opening the name Jesu will be found written upon the head and arms of a cross three times. You will then give and receive with him the following questions and answers:

From whither do you come? Answer: The Holy faith.

Whom do you serve? Answer: The Holy Father at Rome, the Pope, and the Roman Catholic Church Universal throughout the world.

Who commands you? Answer: The Successor of St. Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus or the Soldiers of Jesus Christ.

Who received you? Answer: A venerable man in white hair.

How? Answer: With a naked dagger, I kneeling upon the cross beneath the banners of the Pope and of our sacred order.

Did you take an oath? Answer: I did, to destroy heretics and their governments and rulers, and to spare neither age, nor sex, nor condition; to be as a corpse without any opinion or will of my own, but to implicitly obey my Superiors in all things without hesitation or murmuring.

Will you do that? Answer: I will.

How do you travel? Answer: In the bark of Peter the fisherman.

Whither do you travel? Answer: To the four quarters of the globe.

For what purpose? Answer: To obey the orders of my General and Superiors and execute the will of the Pope and faithfully fulfil the conditions of my oaths.

Go ye, then, into all the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope. He who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Vice-Regent on earth, let him be accursed and exterminated.

And the textbooks that we are forced to read in our schools tell us that Christianity is a holy religion. But then, this education system was designed by a missionary named Thomas Babington Macaulay.

What is in a name: A middle name

According to the Jesuit extreme oath of Induction, those who are loyal to pope, are trained to act as dissembler. Now, a dissembler is one who disguises or conceals his real nature, motives or feeling behind a false appearance. In other words, these guys are trained to cheat. 

The above news item has four pictures. They are showing cops standing guard in front of a church, broken window panes of a church through which one can see some persons sitting as if praying, another smashed window and one place where some vandalism seems to have taken place. 

Then the content of the item tells us that the newly elected BJP government had asked a former Judge Mr. Somasekhara to investigate the attacks on some churches in Karnataka and the judge absolved the state machinery and sangh parivar, of the attacks.

But report by another former Judge of High court has reported the opposite

t: http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/karnataka-church-attack-a-harsher-report-83202?cp

Read more at: http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/karnataka-church-attack-a-harsher-report-83202?cp

Justice MF Saldanha conducted an independent inquiry and says the state police was involved in the attacks

Read more at: http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/karnataka-church-attack-a-harsher-report-83202?cp

Now what would gullible readers conclude from the news item? That both reports are by Judges but since the former is appointed by the government and the other is independent, therefore the independent report is more credible. Thus Karnataka police is anti Christian and so is the BJP government.

Moreover, Justice M.F. Saldanha has categorically stated that 

any commission or inquiry set up by the government to investigate its own actions in unlikely to be impartial.

Read more at: http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/karnataka-church-attack-a-harsher-report-83202?cp

A daring statement by a daring Judge, who is so impartial that he decided on his own to conduct an inquiry. Must be a really sensitive and passionate soul.

Let us go a little deeper. Did you notice the initials of the independent judge. M.F. They stand for Michael Francis. 

So what, you might ask. You are right in asking the question because he can be an honest and impartial judge, even if he is a christian. Well, this guy is the President of Catholic Union of south Kanara. Howzzat? For an impartial judge. Now, let us apply his logic on his actions:

any commission or inquiry by the president of a fundamentalist organization, which is also one of the involved parties is unlikely to be impartial.

Now, as far as his sensitivity and compassion are concerned, he was in the forefront in opposing the bill against cow slaughter. For that he joined hands with Muslim organizations with the bogey that the bill was an effort to control the eating habits of the minorities. Can it get any more ridiculous then this?

If that is not enough, then, here is a gem from this independent judge which can be found on the site of international institute of religious freedom. The intentions of this institute can be gauged from the fact that they are not showing in the map, Kashmir as a part of our nation.

Brahmins from Udupi district and Mangalore city have played a leading role in Karnataka's Hindutva movement. This is unsurprising, as Hindu nationalism is driven primarily by Brahmins desperate to preserve caste privilege. As those at the very top of the Hindu caste system, powerful Brahmins have the most to lose from any spread of Christian egalitarianism. So they are compelled to fight Christianity -- unless of course, the Holy Spirit transforms and humbles their hearts

Exactly the line of Christian missionaries. What this former judge is conveying is that Hindu nationalism is bad because it is primarily driven by Brahmins. Such a vitriolic statement against an entire community. Wow! I hope, for the sake of humanity, that we don't have others of such propensity sitting in High courts? 

Even more interesting is the word Christian egalitarianism. Egalitarianism, according to dictionary, means - 

a social system in which everyone has equal status and the same money and opportunities.

Firstly, about the money part. I guess the learned judge has shared his riches with other poor Christians. Have you, my lord?

Now, regarding equal status in egalitarian Christianity, the biblical God can give best answer to that. For that check in Here. 

Coming back to Prannoy JAMES Roy's NDTV story. Yes. That is his middle name. Whether it is part of the notorious trick of Jesuits' dissimilitude or a coincidence, I do not know. But he sure did hide the ugly face of the 'peaceful protesters' who were attacking the cops with stones and soft drink bottles.

They don't look like pious women praying and kneeling. Do they?

But if you watch only NDTV, you might be wondering about the docility of Christians and Brutality of BJP government.

But then, predatory creeds do not have ethics.

Oath of the Jesuits - 1

I want you to trust a document recorded in a journal of Congress. Will you?

No. No. I am not asking you to trust the party called Indian National Congress. I have not gone senile. Not yet. Like every sensible citizen of our country, I also know that we can trust an alley cat but not this congress. I was referring to the U.S. congress.

Unlike Indian national congress, which is being run as a family affair, the U.S. congress has a pretty democratic system of publishing its journals. I am talking about a document titled 

Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction

as recorded in the journals of the 62nd Congress, 3rd session, of United States Congressional Record (House calendar number 397, Report number 1523, February 15, 1913, pp 3215-16.

It contains one of the ugliest aspects of Christianity. So ugly that someone has torn it out of the journal, CIA style. But by then, the damage had been done. Many researchers and credible persons having access to the records had copied it down. One of them was Ian Paisley, leader of Democratic Unionist party and church minister of Northern Ireland.

This oath is administered to Jesuits, who have to be elevated from lower rungs to a position of command. Firstly, the setting of the ceremony.

When a Jesuit of the minor rank is to be elevated to command, he is conducted into the Chapel of the Convent of the Order, where there are only three others present, the principal or Superior standing in front of the altar. On either side stands a monk, one of whom holds a banner of yellow and white, which are the Papal colours, and the other a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones, with the word INRI, and below them the words

IUSTUM NECAR REGES IMPIUS.

Upon the floor is a red cross at which the postulant or candidate kneels. The Superior hands him a small black crucifix, which he takes in his left hand and presses to his heart, and the Superior at the same time presents to him a dagger, which he grasps by the blade and holds the point against his heart, the Superior still holding it by the hilt, and thus addresses the postulant:

So much for the settings of the oath taking ceremony. Now, the superior addresses to the postulant:

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a Reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant; and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope. You have been taught to plant insidiously the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and to incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace; to take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means. You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope's sake, whose servants we are unto death. You have received all your instructions heretofore as a novice, a neophyte, and have served as co-adjurer, confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all that is necessary to command in the Army of Loyola in the service of the Pope. You must serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated his labours with the blood of the heretic; for "without the shedding of blood no man can be saved". Therefore, to fit yourself for your work and make your own salvation sure, you will, in addition to your former oath of obedience to your order and allegiance to the Pope, repeat after me:

I do not know about you but I have never seen or heard, or even imagined, anything so revulsive, that too in the name of religion. Let us revisit:

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler; 

Now, what is dissemble - To disguise or conceal one's real nature, motives, or feelings behind a false appearance.

What kind of holy (sic) men have to hide behind false appearance? and upto what extent? Let us see.

and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man.

 look at the irony, calling them brethren and still be a spy among them.

and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.

Hmmm. This is the level of dissembling he is talking about. Look at the venom; 'descend so low as to become a Jew'. For the sake of gathering information for the pope. 

If you are wondering about the word jesuit, they are members of an order called 'Society of Jesus'. It was formed by a devout Christian called Ignatius Loyola in early fifteenth century. 

Does the name 'Francis Xavier' ring a bell. Yes. The same one called St. Xavier in our country. This monster was one of Loyola's first five disciples. He came to our country and saw that Hindus were either not converting to Christianity or those who were converting due to the inducement of free rice, relapsed into their old religion. He got enraged and wrote in 1542 to the King of Portugal to set up the office of Inquisition, headquartered at Goa.

The king was busy in activities in Europe, thus Inquisition started a little late, in 1560 on Hindus. By that time, Francis Xavier, who was instrumental in getting this dastardly arrangement on our forefathers, had died.  Maybe that is why, we find no reference of 'descending so low as to become a Hindu' in the words of holy father.

Back to superiors holy talk.

You have been taught to plant insidiously (according to dictionary - harmful but enticing) the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, (e.g. Dalits have been oppressed by Brahmans, imaginary Aryan Dravidian conflict) provinces, states that were at peace, and to incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other (like Buddhists), and to create revolutions and civil wars (e.g. North eastern states are in the grip of fundamental Christian groups) in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace; to take sides with the combatants (may be maoists) and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, (e.g who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

Take due care of the words heretics of every class and character because that will automatically include Hindus. The postulant is not a man on the street but has been a
confessor and priest. The priests are genuinely awarded here. Now this confessor and priest is going to serve his time in the service of Pope as the instrument and executioner (may be, in Kandhamal). He has to labour with the blood of heretics like me becuase none can command here who has not consecrated his labours with the blood of the heretic; for "without the shedding of blood no man can be saved".  Really a peaceful ideology. If you do not know the meaning of heretic, it means, every person, who does not act in accordance with Church. For more, check out here.


हे राम!

Nuns who rape

The source of this post is a book named "Masterkey to Popery" written by a former catholic priest "Anthony Gavins". He has recorded some confessions taken from the records of Catholic church. It contains confessions made by Christians as far back as eighteenth century.

The author describes what goes on behind the closed doors of convents. According to him

By the constitutions of their order, so many days are appointed, in which all the nuns are obliged to confess, from the Mother Abbess to the very wheeler, i.e., the nun that turns the wheel near the door, through which they give and receive everything they want. They have a father confessor, and a father companion, who live next to the convent, and have a small grate in the wall of their chamber ... In all those grates the nuns confess their sins...

For the information of the uninitiated, confession is a ritual in which the Christians are supposed to talk to a father through a grill or a grate and divulge any acts committed by him/her since the last confession. How young girls fall into, or are lured into, being a nun is described by the author as

"Many gentlemen send their daughters to the nunnery when they are some five, some six, some eight years old ... and when they are fifteen years old ... they receive the habit of a nun, and begin the year of novicate, which is the year of trial, to see whether they can go through all the hardships, fastings, disciplines, prayers, hours of divine service, obedience, poverty, chastity, and penance's practiced in the monastery ..."

The senior 'sisters' make sure that the young girls are not given any hard or demanding chores to perform, in this year of novicate, lest they shed the idea of being a nun. Thus, they are shown a rosy picture that they will lead a life of leisure and comfort.

"After this (i.e. after taking the vow) they have the liberty to go to the grate and talk with gentlemen, priests and friars, who go there as a gallant goes to see his mistress. So when the nuns begin to have a notion of the pleasures of the world, and how they have been deceived, they are heartily sorry, but too late, for there is no remedy. And minding nothing but to satisfy their passions as well as they can, they abandon themselves to all sorts of wickedness and amorous intrigues." [Page 40-41]

This sense of being conned into celibacy makes them "abondon themselves to all sorts of wickedness and amorous intrigue". They have a tendency to "satisfy their passions as well as they can".

Father Gaivins tells us about a word 'deveto' used in the nunneries. He tells us that each nun had her 'spiritual husband' called devoto. [pp 54]

When it is dark evening, they send away the Devotos and the doors are locked up, they go to their own chamber to write a billet, or letter to the spiritual husband, which they send in the morning to them, and get an answer  and though they see one another almost every day, for all that, they must write to one another every morning : And these letters of love, they call the recreation of the spirit for the time they are absent from them. Every day they must give one another an account of whatever thing they have done since the last visit; and indeed there are warmer expressions of love, and jealousy between the Nun, and the Devoto than between real wife and husband. 

After this background, the father tells about confession of a Nun. This confession was made by her, ten months after she had taken the vows of celibacy.

Nun: I do confess that ever since I did not care what should become of me, I have abandoned myself to all the sins I have been able to commit. It is but ten months since I made my profession and bound myself to perpetuity, though as I did it without intention, I am not a nun before God ... and of this opinion are many other nuns, especially the young nuns, my intimate friends, who, as well as I, do communicate to one another, the most sacred things of our hearts."

"Each of this assembly has her devoto, and we are every day in the afternoon at the grate ... 

Now coming to my greatest sin, I must tell you, that a nun of our assembly has a friar her devoto, the most beautiful young man, and we contrived and agreed to bring him into the convent, as we did, and have kept him two and twenty days [22 days] in our chamber. During which time we went to the grate very seldom, on pretense of being not well. We have given no scandal for nobody suspected the least thing in the case."

Confessor: Pray, tell me, how could you let him in without scandal?

Nun: 

One of the assembly contrived to mat all the floor of her chamber and sent for the mat-maker to take the measure of the length and breadth of the room ... When the mat was there, and the man paid for it, one day in the evening ... the friar [who had asked leave of his prior to go into the country for a month's time and disguising himself in a layman's habit] came into the Sexton's room, and rolling himself up in the mat, the porters brought the mat to the door where we were waiting for it; and taking it, we carried it up to one of our chambers." [Page 57]

If you are wondering about the two porters who had transported the sex crazed holy father into the charge of equally sex crazed holy nuns, relax. The nuns were not only smart and sex starved, they were equally ruthless. This is what she tells us

We were afraid that the porters would discover the thing, but by money we have secured ourselves from them; for we hired ruffians to make away with them.

If you have not understood then she is telling her confessor that they hired goons to kill the porters. Sisters of mercy. Ain't it.

What would happen with such unrestrained assembly for 22 days. Some of the sisters found themselves in a "delicate condition". 

"A month after, three of our friends began to perceive the condition they were in, and left the convent one night, by which they have given great scandal to the city, and we do not know what has become of them; as for me, I design to do the same, for I am under the same apprehensions and fear; for I consider that if I do continue in the convent, my unusual size will discover me, and though one life shall be saved, I shall lose mine by the rulers of the our order in a miserable manner ..."

Look at the last sentence 'losing life by miserable manner'. If that confounds you then you should know more about inquisition. Anyway, read on.

"I am fully resolved to prevent my ruin and death by a strong operating remedy. This is all I have to say, and I do expect from you, not only your advice, but your assistance too." 

The confessor, from whose extract, you are reading this post, was hesitant to assist her. Then she tells him:

I am resolved for all events, and if you refuse me this comfort, I shall cry out, and say, that you have been soliciting and corrupting me in the very act of confession, and you shall suffer for it in the inquisition.

Till now, we have read (here and here) about holy fathers, who blackmailed hapless women with the threat of Inquisition. Here we find that this gal is one step ahead and has changed the rules of the game.

The confessor discussed the case with the moral academy and advised the nun to escape, which she finally did.

If the scandals that keep on surfacing are any indication, things have not changed. As long as girls are being conned into a life contrary to the laws of nature, such acts are bound to happen.

Prashant Bhushan: Can the nation trust him?

I really envy these security forces guys. They are posted in Kashmir, which used to be a paradise. They are really having fun there. I hope you can see the wide grin on the face of the BSF jawan lying on the ground, as he is surrounded by innocent 'civilians'. Do you also envy him his job?

But then, I am not the only one who is envious. And unlike me, who is just satisfied with pounding the keyboard to vent my envy, there are some who really take action.

One of them is Prashant Bhushan.

Don't tell me that you do not know, who Prashant Bhushan is? 

He is the new poster boy of the civil society.

Why? 

Because he talks about human rights, silly. He got so worried about the violation of rights of 'civilians' that he, with a bunch of like minded 'human rights guys' and also 'gals' went all the way from Delhi to the heart of action.
Kashmir, that is.
They call themselves a group by the name of 'Center for Policy analysis'. Here is the link. They are of the opinion that in the summer of 2010, when the civilians were protesting peacefully, the monsters in uniform have killed 118 civilians.

 

Look at the faces of these peaceful protesters. And also look at the fear in the eyes of the woman throwing stone at the forces.

Do you get the picture?

May be the security forces killed some innocent Kashmiris in fake encounters. May be he is right in filing a case in the supreme court of our country regarding the atrocities committed by the rogue elements in the forces.

If that is the case, every right minded citizens should support the cause. But, the sense of justice should be equally applicable for Kashmiri pandits also, who have been the worst of sufferers. I will come to this point later. But first about Pakistan.


I am much younger then Prashant Bhushan but I have begun to realize that I am old fashioned compared to this eminent votary of human rights.

Let me explain. I think that anybody who says that we as a nation need to talk with Pakistan on Kashmir should be tried for treason and sedition because it is our internal matter and Pakistan has no role to meddle in it. But our eminent lawyer is pretty broadminded on this count also. Sample this:

“Our role is to facilitate a dialogue between Kashmir, India and Pakistan,” Bhushan said.

What the ----? Prashant ji, are you representing some international agency which has jurisdiction over India and Pakistan.

Considering the fact that this was his second visit to the valley, perhaps next time he might suggest us to talk to China and Bangladesh also. After all, the more the merrier.

The group has also realized that it is a religious problem and not of Islamic terror called Jihad. But the posters that the Kashmiri pandits read, had something like this to say.

This is typical Islamic Jihad in which, Infidels (काफिर) should be killed and their women should be kept as concubines by Muslim men.


Still our 'eminent lawyer' sees this as a political problem.

The group said Kashmir was a political problem and should be addressed according to the democratic aspirations of people of Kashmir, India and Pakistan.

Exactly the line of divisive rascals like Geelani and Yaseen Malik. And why not?

Because, they had a closed door meeting with all such rascals on their visit. The typical game plan is that while Islamic Jihadis are killing, raping and terrorizing the bloody काफिर कौम, their propaganda machinery should lull the remaining citizenry into the hullabaloo that it is a political problem.

All of us have blind spot, about the size of a small pea. But these guys have been provided a very large one. Not only the suffering of the security forces is not visible to them but they missed the lakhs of Kashmiri Pandits living in their own country as refugees. May be they are not to be counted as humans and thus have no human rights. Am I right Prashant ji? 118 civilians were visible to you but you were unable to hear or see the anguish of lakhs of Kashmiri Pandits, killed, looted, ousted, raped and reduced to penury in their own country. But then, there are no Islamic, petro dollar slushed organizations willing to sponsor such a visit to the ghettos where Kashmiri pandits are living.

Depending on your opinion, you could call him anti Hindu or pro Muslim. But if you have been bugged by the strange secularist's bug, you might call him biased, at least. May be he is the kind of persons who do not like blaming a particular religion and its ideology. May be.

Not strangely, our eminent lawyer finds himself in the esteemed company of Arundhati Roy, Cedric Prakash, John Dayal, Praful Bidwai and Teesta Setalvaad.  What they all have in common is their ability to magnify the sufferings of one community and ignoring those of the other. The others have been dealt with here. In this post I will talk about Prashsant ji only.

In his articles subsequent to the Gujarat riots, he talks about '2000 Muslims' killed in a state 'pogrom'. The article is here. His words are:

Consider the situation in Gujarat. More than 2000 Muslims were killed in a state-abetted pogrom which went on for months.

 and again here :

More than 2,000 Muslims were killed in a statewide genocide which went on for days, with the apparent complicity of the state police and government. Lakhs lost their homes.

Firstly, about the numbers. The UPA government, which has every thing to gain by painting the Modi government as a Muslim killing machine by conducting, in terms of Prashant Bhushan, pogrom and genocide. They have officially declared that 254 Hindus and 790 Muslims were killed in the riots. UPA might have increased the number of Muslims and reduced the number of Hindus for their own motives. Let us assume that UPA consists of truthful (?) angels and stick to their number. Still one wonders at the fantastic figure of 2000 being hollered by 'eminent supreme court lawyer'.

A hindu child roasted by Muslim mob

Again there is not a single word about the 254 Hindus killed. May be, like Kashmiri Pandits, they also had no human rights.

The bogey that was surrounded and burnt with women and children inside

Then, he seems to be a high quality psychologist or behavioral scientist also. So, he talks about 'Hindutva fascist forces'. This is what he says in the company of similar conference loving folks  (this group goes by the name Anhad) in 2008:-

Another legal luminary and fellow advocate in the Supreme Court, Prashant Bhushan, referred to the menacing rise of Hindutva fascist forces that have started resorting to terror bomb blasts and are threatening to export what they consider as the ‘Gujarat model’ of genocidal attacks on minorities to the rest of the country. In this regard, he pointed out how scores of innocent Muslims have been arrested and languish in jail for bomb attacks for which they have no responsibility at all, and in this the police, the intelligence agencies and influential sections of the media are in league with Hindutva forces and the state.

So, Hindutva is menacing to him but Islamic Jehad is not.

Now that we know from the court judgement that 59 Hindus were roasted alive by Jihadi terrorists by using petrol as an accelerant, our psychologist is mum. One just wonders where are his analytical skills? No fascism and no menace from our Muslim brethren, who gathered in thousands around a bogey, shouted Islamic slogans, poured petrol and set trapped women, children and men ablaze.

Blaming Hindu ideology is easy because no one is going to issue a fatwa but Islam should be handled with care because Fatwa is always on the way. A smart and brave lawyer.


If you thought that he is just a gifted lawyer and psychologist, you are in for a surprise. He is also an expert on forensics and is capable of announcing before even the investigating agencies have given a verdict. Here is what he says. February 2011,

The well-known legal activist Prashant Bhushan pointed out that in almost all cases of terror acts, innocent people, mostly Muslims, have been arrested by the police. Even in cases such as the Mecca Masjid (Hyderabad), Malegaon, Ajmer and Samjhauta Express blasts, which are now said to have been the handiwork of Hindutva forces, large numbers of innocent Muslims, accused by the police of being involved, continue to languish in prison. The media continues to remain indifferent to their plight. The police, for its part, he said, was ‘extremely communalized’, and deeply anti-Muslim, which explained why many policemen had no qualms at all about falsely implicating innocent Muslims in terror cases. Communalisation, Bhushan claimed, had even affected the courts. He argued for the need for the state to recruit only such people as police officers and judges who were not communal, and who had not been members of any communal organization.

Amazing skill as a detective. What he forgot or deliberately ignored was the fact that SIMI terrorist Nagori had already made a confession during his Narco test. This is what he told the FSL team in Bangalore (Pioneer has the report and the excerpts are here)

In the Samjhauta Express blasts, some persons from Pakistan had come and they had purchased the suitcase cover at Kataria Market, Indore. One person from (SIMI) Tanzeem had helped them to get the suitcase cover stitched. SIMI leader Abdul Razak had helped the Pakistanis in the Samjhauta Express blasts.

Thus, our 'activist' is in apparently in connivance with the present UPA to tarnish the Hindu civilization by dragging the name in Samjhauta and Malegaon blasts. Not only Samjhauta blast,

Nagori and his associates have also confessed to SIMI’s role and involvement of Muslims in terror attacks in Mumbai, Aurangabad, Hyderabad, Ajmer and the shootout at the American consulate in Kolkata

Although none of the 'Hindu terrorists' have been convicted as yet but 'the man with a soft heart' has declared them terrorists, where as not a single word about those who have been convicted by the courts because they are Muslims.

It seems that the 'eminent lawyer' knows more then even the terrorists. Probably, apart from proficiency in law, psychology, behavioral science and forensics, he has got the gift of extra sensory perception also.


What happened in Batla house encounter according to Prashant Bhushan is a reaction to Gujarat pogrom.

He, however, admitted that there may be some Muslim terrorists in the country. And this is possible after what happened in Gujarat in 2002. But surely they are not behind every bombing in the country, he said.

Aha! So that's it. Muslim terrorism has started in our country after 2002 only.  And that too, only as a retaliation. By that token, the Kashmiri Pandits also would have become terrorists and they would have started it from the ninth decade of the last century.  And since the atrocities on them have been much more severe, sustained and cruel, they would have been behind every blast in our nation. Am I right Prashant ji?

Oh sorry! that was a political problem. I forgot, 'eminent human rights votary' sir.

Once you become an intellectual mercenary, it is easy to hide your true colors from simpletons like Anna Hazare and Swami Ramdev. Will they be able to see through the game of deception?

Just Wondering!


Related posts -

Arvind Kejriwal - The real face.

Anna and UPA - Who is helping who.

Anna What a mess you have made.

It is just to kill

If you, like me have sometimes wondered about the four letters written on the Christian cross, viz.  
I.N.R.I., 

then the mystery has been solved. It stands for 

Iustum Necar Reges Impios

It is Latin language. What it means is 

It is just to exterminate Impious or heretical kings, rulers or governments.

Hardly the kind of statement from a religion which claims to be religion of mercy. No mercy or forgiving here. 

It is Just to exterminate! Kill! Annihilate!

Still, one might think that it is fine to kill bad guys. That is where the catch is. Pay attention to the word heretical or heretic. According to the free dictionary:

A person who holds controversial opinions, especially one who publicly dissents from the officially accepted dogma of the Roman Catholic Church.

According to the Merriam Webster's dictionary:

a dissenter from established religious dogma; especially : a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church who disavows a revealed truth

So, according to this holy(?) inscription, if a catholic Christian kills someone having an opinion different from that of the church, it will not be a heinous crime against humanity. On the contrary, he/she will be dispensing justice because it is Just to kill heretics.

Bear two things in mind. One, these are not the rantings of some marginalized or fringe organization. It can be seen in every cemetery. Two, these words are not just a show off. They have been and perhaps are being practised albeit, in a conceited manner. One example should suffice. Giardiano Bruno, who was an eminent thinker, mathematician, philosopher  and astronomer was burnt alive on 17 february, 1600.

Why?
because he dared to have an opinion different from that of the church. His crimes for which he was publicly burnt alive were:

1. Holding opinions contrary to catholic faith and speaking about them. Can one get any more rabid than this? Killing for holding an opinion.
2. Holding erroneous views regarding the holy trinity and reincarnation of Jesus. Now, those of you who are wondering about this holy trinity, let me clarify. Christianity is a monotheistic religion i.e. it says that there is only one God. Then according to this view, Jesus was the son of holy father because Mary was impregnated by the holy ghost. To add to the confusion, The holy father, the holy ghost and Jesus are one. They are called the holy trinity. Bruno did not believe in this illogical mathematics, which was his undoing. Moreover, he held the view that nothing like reincarnation of Jesus took place.
3. Holding erroneous opinions about Jesus Christ.
4. Claiming existence of plural worlds.
5. Denying virginity of Mary.
6. Dealing in magic.
7. Believing in transmigration of soul from humans.

For these 'crimes against church' and 'heresy', he was burnt at the stake. That used to be JUSTICE, Christianity style.


Today, evangelization is probably the biggest business and church is the biggest employer. It is run like a corporate. The time has changed and one can not go about burning men publicly. In fact, if the truth of the church comes out, it will be embarassing for the church. Not that they are sensitive enough to feel embarrassed. Just that the business will suffer. 

So, the public relations branch of the church came up with new face, now the holy fathers talk about mercy. Gone is the terminology like 'just to exterminate'. New one is 'love of Jesus'. Along with that the old rubble, which could cause hindrance had to be brushed under the carpet, therefore a new expansion had to be found out for I.N.R.I. The operation cover up came up with another expansion. It is

 Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum

which means Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews.

No more talk of annihilating heretics or their governments. That is nowadays the job of CIA or MI5.

The more steadfast ones might question that what I am writing is just a conspiracy theory because I have not produced any proof for the former expansion of I.N.R.I. being the original one. 

For that wait for my next post. Till then, try to find the facts for yourself.

Inquisition: Part 1

This is an extract from the Bible. It is from the chapter 13 of Deuteronomy of the Bible. The God of Bible is asking its believers to check if anyone serves any other Gods,  then first the believers should enquire diligently and then kill those who serve other Gods.

If thou shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the LORD thy God hath given thee to dwell there, saying,

Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known;

Then shalt thou enquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you;

Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.

Serve other Gods ?

Who is saying this. God of the Bible. But we have been bombarded with the lines to the effect that 'God is one'.

And here we find that the Biblical God is not only confused about his solitary existence but is suffering from a mix of emotions which we label as human. Anxiety. Jealousy. Anger. Insecurity. 

What is the extent of this Jealousy?

The faithful Christians are supposed to kill all those who 'serve other Gods'. The words used are 'smite with edge of a sword'. The command is clear. 

Kill.

Why?

Because they 'serve other Gods'. What a crime! 

God tussi great ho!

If you missed the detail, let me refresh. 'and the cattle thereof, with the edge of sword'.

So, mute cattle are also to be killed. Why? Because, someone did not believe in one particular God mentioned in Bible. So, the crime of the cattle is that they belonged to some person or community who believed in other God. Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews et al. are to be killed. And their cattle. This is the God of mercy.

Today, in twenty first century, the church and its peddlers have changed the tactics. Today, they utter a lot of fast talk only of mercy and compassion. Do not be fooled because it is just that. Talk. Nothing else. Just a mask on the real face. The face colored red by the blood of millions of innocent humans. And of course Cattle.

But that is not the topic of the post because if I have to right a post on the gory chapters of Bible, It will take a lot of web space. Kindly look at the bold words in the extract from Bible.

Yes. Enquire and ask diligently.

If you find that the God of Bible is perverted enough, then you must know what his followers did. They took these two words seriously. Very seriously. The result was the most well oiled machinery of corruption, death, torture, rape, frauds and Misery. 

The Pope along with his entire gang of archbishop, bishops, friars and the rest devised a tribunal, which was named Inquisition, with a capital I. 

It worked like this. If anyone was suspected or reported to have deviated from the behaviour in accordance with the Bible or the Church, he was taken into custody for Inquisition. There he was asked diligently by the loving fathers.

A french doctor named Dellon, who was in India suffered at the hands of this tribunal in eighteenth century. This is how he describes their diligence:

This diabolical tribunal takes cognizance of heresy, Judaism, Muhammadanism, sodomy, and polygamy; and the people stand in so much fear of it, that parents deliver up their children, husbands their wives and masters their servants to its officers, without daring in the least to murmur. The prisoners are kept for a long time, till they themselves turn their own accusers, and declare the cause of their imprisonment, for which they are neither told their crime, nor confronted with witnesses. As soon as they are imprisoned, their friends go into mourning,' and speak of them as dead, not daring to solicit their pardon, lest they should be brought in as accomplices. When there is no shadow of proof against the pretended criminal, he is discharged, after suffering the most cruel tortures, a tedious and dreadful imprisonment, and the loss of the greatest part of his effects. The sentence against prisoners is pronounced publicly and with extraordinary solemnity.

Do not flatter yourself that Hinduism is not present in the list of crimes here. In fact, Hindus suffered most cruel treatment. More on that later. In fact, the word heresy could be and was, defined as the situation demanded.

He is not exaggerating because he had first hand experience. He was one of those rare victims who survived the ordeal.

If you have not had that spooky feeling up your spine, till now, it sure will come, once you go through the list of machinery.

When I say machinery, that is what I mean. Take a peek. This is one of the items designed for the use of our loving fathers.

Oral - Vaginal - Anal Pear

The name of the machine gives the idea of its use. No!

Okay let me explain. One of the descriptions says that it was put in the mouth of the poor fellow at the mercy of church fathers and the screw was slowly rotated. It resulted in the opening up of the four metal leaves into the mouth, distending the jaw, without the chance of closing. 

Why would they be interested in keeping the mouth open?

So, that our loving church fathers could pour molten lead into the mouth. Yes, because that is how Bible describes punishment by burning.

This is how the perforated spoon used for pouring lead into the mouths of the victims was sketched by Gerald Tholen. I could not locate the real thing, thus suspect that may be they have not been preserved. That is why you are looking at a sketch instead of a photograph. It has been taken from the book 'Thumbscrew and Rack by George Macdonald ISBN 0-910309-68-X. It was sketched because the artist saw it at an exhibition.This snapshot, I have taken from the book 'Why Christianity happens to be a system of organized crime', by Maanoj Rakhit.

Most of the records have been lost or destroyed. Like the prison in India, which was located at Goa was called 'the Big house'. It has been described by Dellone in his book 'Account of Inquisition' to have had 200 cells of size 10 x10. But before the portuguese left, they had destroyed the records as well as 'the big house'.

Now, think of this instrument being thrust into the orifices of a woman and the screw rotated. Can you feel her pain, shame, helplessness.

Look at the other specimen which have survived the centuries and appreciate what I am trying to say.

Look at the spike at the end. Try to imagine the depravity of the sick mind which would have thought of designing such an object. And imagine one single lady, stripped and bound, white and black robed holy (sic) bastards surrounding her to enjoy her pain and misery.

That is how they enquired and asked diligently. This asking was called Inquisition.

No wonder that most of the women preferred to get raped by the fathers instead of being gang raped in dungeons and then being killed brutally. 

The fathers had a happy time raping all the women of their parishes or torturing and killing the gritty ones. Inquisition started in 1206 and it was aptly named Pope Innocent III who gave the permission of use of torture during Inquisition.

For next six centuries, pope after pope, continued with this tribunal and it became more and more efficient (read cruel). It was the disenchantment of Europeans with the church that forced the church to relinquish this cruel arrangement in first quarter of nineteenth century.

If the ordinary fathers had so much fun, how much the popes would have enjoyed can only be guessed.

Somethings never change. It is true for crooks. Look here.  

No wonder the crooked machinery is still working overtime in our country to bring back the 'kingdom of God'. The God that wants those who serve 'other Gods' to be killed. And also their cattle. Holy cow!

80 Popes in continuation lorded over this tribunal. Yes. 80 Popes. In succession. They would have loved the perks of  the office. It was called 'The holy office'. These guys really had a macabre sense of humor.

The pope wears Prada shoes. What would we call it? Mercy. Compassion. Consumerism. Someone said he loves Gucci to. Wonder what else he loves.

Just Wondering!

Somewhat related:

I am the lord, your God.