CRIMINALS CALLED SUFIS - AMIR KHUSRO

Trying to show that Islam is a 'religion of peace' is a recent phenomena. It gained currency in last seven decades. Prior to that, the protagonists of Islam were honest and straight forward. They never felt the need to hide behind the smoke screen of 'peace' or 'love' because they had the might of sword with them. Exactly like Christianity, which has re-branded and re-packaged itself as 'religion of love'.

One aspect of this 'image building exercise' is 'advertising' the sufi tradition of Islam with the message that sufis were some nice and gentle people who loved all, irrespective of religion or dharm. Like all advertisers, these apologists of Islam know that people, by and large, can be herded like sheep because humans are intellectually lazy (most of them). Most of the Hindus, have taken the bait, hook, line and sinker.

One of such 'great' poet, sufi and artist was Amir Khusro. Full name Muhammad Hassan Yaminuddin. Born in 1253 and died in 1325.

He is said to be a great human being because, he was the father of Kawwali, he invented (sic) Sitar, he invented (sic) tabla, he loved Hindustan, and of course, he was not a fundamentalist. In fact, he was someone, who was above the bigotry, typical of Islam.

Let us look at the truth, in his own words.

First of all, let us look at his love for Hindustan and the reasons for it. The following excerpt is from his poem Ashiqa, written in Persian.

"Happy Hindustan, the splendour of Religion, where the Law finds perfect honour and security. In learning Dehli can now compete with Bokhara, for Islam has been made manifest by its kings.

The Hindustan that he finds happy is one in which Islam was prevalent. Established by its kings. 

What about Hinduism ? It comes in the next line.

The whole country, by means of the sword of our holy warriors, has become like a forest denuded of its thorns by fire. The land has been saturated with the water of the sword, and the vapours of infidelity have been dispersed. The strong men of Hind have been trodden under foot, and all are ready to pay Jizya.

The holy warriors means Jihadis, 
forest denuded of its thorns by fire is for Hindus which have been killed.
water of the sword means Blood of Hindus and 
vapors of infidelity refers to हिन्दू धर्म. 
Jizya was a tax which Hindus paid in those centuries, just to live. They hand to buy the right to live as a Hindu by paying this tax. Its mode of payment was designed to humiliate Hindus, which I will explain after finishing this paragraph from the pen of Sufi. 


The 'kind sufi' further says:

Islam is triumphant, idolatry is subdued. Had not the law granted exemption from death by the payment of poll-tax, the very name of Hind, root and branch, would have been extinguished. From Ghazni to the shore of the ocean you see all under the dominion of Islam.  

The system of Islamic code, used in Hindustan was Hanafi. This is the only code, out of the four Islamic codes, which gave the option of letting Hindus live in Islamic rule. The other three say that idolators have either to be converted to Muslims or killed. Here, the 'sufi saint' is lamenting the fact that it is due to Hanafi law that Hindus are alive, otherwise they would have been finished off. Further he adds:

Cawing crows see no arrows pointed at them ; nor is the Tarsa (Christian) there, who does not fear (taras) to render the servant equal with God ; nor the Jew who dares to exalt the Pentateuch to a level with the Kuran; nor the Magli who is delighted with the worship of fire, but of whom the fire complains with its hundred tongues. The four sects of Musulmans are at amity, and the very fish are Sunnis."

Cawing crows 'काले कव्वे' was his favorite term for Hindus. 

I hope that gives us an insight into the mind of a bigot, who is being paraded as a 'gentle sufi'. As one reads the true history of the Sufis, one finds that Amir Khusro was one of the lesser psychopaths. Others were far more monstrous. Killing and raping Hindus was mundane for them. About one more such sufi, मोइनुद्दीन चिश्ती, read here. All this is in accordance with कुरआन and life style of पैगम्बर मोहम्मद.

The era in which Khusro lived was a nightmare for Hindus as wave after wave of Islamic invaders was coming to plunder the 'golden sparrow'. The wealth and women of Hindus were raped and these hapless raped Hindu women gave birth to more bigots in the Harems of Muslims. Amir Khusro was one such product. He was fathered by a turkish soldeir to a Hindu Rajput woman. 

Now coming to Jizya. It was in accordance to Quran (9:29) :

Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Look at the last three words - 'feel themselves subdued'. It has been translated differently by different scholars of Islam. The above mentioned translation is by 'Hilali and Khan'. It is said to be (link)

Now the most widely disseminated Qur'an in most Islamic bookstores and Sunni mosques throughout the English-speaking world

Its हिंदी translation by Farooq Khan and Nadwi (link) says it like:

वह लोग ज़लील होकर (अपने) हाथ से जज़िया दे 

Ziauddeen Barani, a close friend of Amir Khusro, has recorded a conversation between Allauddeen khilji and a Qazi Mughisuddeen regarding Hindus and payment of Jizya. Here it is:

The Sultan then asked, " How are Hindus designated in the law, as payers of tribute (Kharaj guzar) or givers of tribute {kharaj-deh) ?" The Kazi replied, "They are called payers of tribute (ज़िम्मी), and when the revenue officer demands silver from them, they should, without question and with all humility and respect, tender gold. If the officer throws dirt into their mouths, they must without reluctance open their mouths wide to receive it. By doing so they show their respect for the officer. The due subordination of the zimmi (tribute-payer) is exhibited in this humble payment and by this throwing of dirt into their mouths. The glorification of Islam is a duty, and contempt of the Religion is vain. God holds them in contempt, for he says, 'Keep them under in subjection.' To keep the Hindus in abasement is especially a religious duty, because they are the most inveterate enemies of the Prophet, and because the Prophet has commanded us to slay them, plunder them, and make them captive, saying, ' Convert them to Islam or kill them, enslave them and spoil their wealth and property.' No doctor but the great doctor (Hanifa), to whose school we belong, has assented to the imposition of the jizya (poll tax) on Hindus. Doctors of other schools allow no other alternative (to Hindus) but 'Death or Islam.'"

That is the kind of 'Happy Hindustan' that Amir Khusro loved. When Mullahs talk about imposing Sharia in our country, they are drooling at the prospect of raping Hindu women as they did in those dark ages, all sanctioned by Quran. Here it is (Quran - chapter4, Verse 3) :

And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphan-girls, then marry (other) women of your choice, two or three, or four but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or (the captives and the slaves) that your right hands possess. That is nearer to prevent you from doing injustice.

The euphemism - 'your right hand possess' is better explained in the Hindi translation (link) which tells the true meaning

या उस स्त्री (लौंड़ी) पर जो तुम्हारे क़ब्ज़े में आई हो

Anyway, let us get back to our loving poet, who represents a 'composite culture', which teaches tolerance. Here is more of his love for Hindustan (his poems describe the fun he had) :

The lightning of Mughal fury penetrated even to those parts, and smoke arose from the burning towns of Hindustan, and the people, flying from their flaming houses, threw themselves into the rivers and torrents.

Although Northern Africa was converted to Islam in a short span of time, Hindus fought Islam for more then a thousand years. During many such wars, Khusro accompanied the Islamic Ganglords. Following are some such descriptions in which he poetically talks about the sorry state of Hindus and Hinduism.

When the bank of the entrenchment had reached the height of the western bastion of the fortress, the Royal Westerns, shot large earthen balls against that infidel fort, so that the hearts of the Hindus began to quail."

These translations have been taken from 'History of India as told by its own historians' written by Elliot and Dowson in eight volumes. Let me go through the other volumes to share more about this sufi.

On the same topic, more exposure of :


Moin-ud-deen Chishti
Sufi Muhammad Ghaus
Sufi Sayyid Ali Hamdani

Khwaja mere Khwaja

Because of his Sword, instead of idols and temples in the land of unbelief now there are mosques, mihrãb and mimbar. In the land where there were the sayings of the idol-worshippers, there is the sound of ‘Allãhu Akbar’.

That is how or Mîr Khwurd has described Moinuddeen Chishti, whose tomb is at Ajmer. This iconoclast has been refferred to as a sufi saint by secular propagandists.

Hardly the kind of description that would fit a saint or what is known as 'sufi'. 

Marriage ?

Anyway, what would you think of a man who has taken a young woman from a dacoit as a gift for 'marriage'?

A pervert? Rapist? Monster? or a saint?

Well, here is more on Moinuddeen Chishti.

According to historian Sita Ram Goel, in 'Hindu temples - What happened to them (part 2)'  

Mu‘în al-dîn had a second wife for the following reason: one night he saw the Holy Prophet in the flesh. The prophet said: ‘You are not truly of my religion if you depart in any way from my sunnat.’ It happened that the ruler of the Patli fort, Malik Khitãb, attacked the unbelievers that night and captured the daughter of the Rãjã of that land. He presented her to Mu‘în al-dîn who accepted her and named her Bîbî Umiya 

Howzzat for a saint ?

The prophet comes in a dream and tells him to keep a hapless woman, who has been snatched away from his father, probably after killing him, and then rape her in the name of marriage. 

Try to imagine a young woman, brought up in an environment where meat eating is considered a sin and beef eating is considered to be the worst possible deeds. She is kidnapped from these safe environs and handed over to an old man, who takes pride in eating of cow flesh. 

If we believe the marxists, she converted to Islam and was named Bibi Umiya. 

Sick bastards.

You do not have to trust me or this respected and honest historian, verify it for yourself from the official website of the 'dargah'. Here is the link. The only difference between the above mentioned version and the one mentioned in the site is whether she was first or second wife. For me the order is not significant.

What kind of pervert will consider such a man to be holy, I really can not fathom. 

The extent of horror will be more clear if you understand the real meaning of the statements. Now, look at the alleged statement of the prophet, which I have underlined for the readers convenience. 

'depart from sunnat'?

Most of you will not understand it. These are euphemisms of Islam. The prophet of Islam, Mohammad, is said to be the role model for all Muslims. He has to be emulated in every respect. It is mentioned in Quran and the verse of Quran which says so can be read here.

The behaviour of his 'sunnat' or practice here is to marry kaafir women. Mohammad in his life time had married many women after killing their husbands. They were given the choice to convert to Islam. Those who converted, were 'married' to Mohammad and those who had a little more spine and did not convert were kept as his concubines (रखैल). Either way, they had to be there for the carnal pleasures of Mohammad.Two such wives of Mohammad were Juwairiya (Another one for prophet) and Safiya (kill husband, get the wife).

So, this 'pious' man called 'Khwaja Moinuddeen Chishti' 'married' the poor woman. Muslims, as well as Hindus visit his tomb, as if it was some sort of a holy place. That is a legacy of Nehruvian secularism, which has uprooted all sense of pride and rationality from the collective psyche of our nation.

Hate for Hindu temples

The opening quote of this post has been taken from 'SIYAR AL AQTAB' written by a pious Muslim. He further gives us an insight into the mind of this 'sufi'

Although at that time there were very many temples of idols around the lake, when the Khwaja saw them, he said: ‘If God and His Prophet so will, it will not be long before I raze to the ground these idol temples.

And the secularists want us to believe that sufis were not bigots and were responsible for the भक्ति movement. So thorough has been the brainwashing that a large number of our citizens have internalised the lie as truth. What they do not know is that the term 'movement' used here, in itself, is a misnomer.

Aim of Sufis

In fact, historians, (that is, the real historians, not from NCERT or AMU or JNU) tell us that sufis were sent into regions as information gatherers so that the Islamic invaders can have a first hand knowledge of the target localities. That is why, wherever they went, Islamic invaders followed. 

Many sufis were sent in all directions by Nizãmu’d-Dîn Awliyã, the Chistîyya luminary of Delhi; all of them actively participated in jihãds against the local population.  Nizãmu’d-Dîn’s leading disciple, Nasîru’d-Dîn Chirãg-i-Dihlî, exhorted the sufis to serve the Islamic state.  “The essence of sufism,” he versified, “is not an external garment. Gird up your loins to serve the Sultãn and be a sufi.

History of sufism in India by S.A.A. Rizvi, pp 189, Vol. 1

Muslims (?) are they really Muslims?

The irony is that those, who were suppressed the most by these bigots, are the most vocal supporters of sufis. Today, the missionary education system, combined with secularists propaganda has robbed the power of reasoning from most of the products of this system. This was predicted by these very sufis, albeit in a different context.

The descendants of those who were converted to Islam in this land will live until the Day of Judgement; so too will those who bring others into the fold of Islam by the sword of Islam. Until the Day of Judgement these converts will be in the debt of Shaykh al-Islãm Mu‘în al-dîn Hasan Sijzã and these people will be drawing closer to Almighty Allãh because of the auspicious devotion of Mu‘în al-dîn.

The Shrine and Cult of Mu‘in al-Dîn Chishtî of Ajmer, P.M. Currie pp 30

The Muslims who go there do not know that they are paying homage to a deranged criminal who would have been responsible for the rape and murder of ancestors of these very Muslims, who were originally Hindu.
Today, the times have changed, therefore, the Maulavis have changed like a chameleon. The tough talk of 'sword of Islam' has been replaced by 'Islam is the religion of peace' and 'all religions are same'. Most of us have swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

Denigrating Hindus

The only religion which says that we all are part of God and God resides in us is Hindu religion, which Gandhi called सनातन धर्म  and swami Dayanand Saraswati आर्य धर्म. The statement 

अहम् ब्रह्मास्मि 

means 'I am God' implying that everything animate and inanimate is God or extension of God. 
How this sufi saint treated this view is very clearly mentioned in Siyar Al Aqtab:

The other miracle is that before his arrival the whole of Hindustan was submerged by unbelief and idol-worship. Every haughty man in Hind pronounced himself to be Almighty God and considered himself as the partner of God. All the people of India used to prostrate themselves before stones, idols, trees, animals, cows and cow-dung. Because of the darkness of unbelief over this land their hearts were locked and hardened.

“All India was ignorant of orders of religion and law. All were ignorant of Allãh and His Prophet. None had seen the Ka‘ba. None had heard of the Greatness of Allãh.

“Because of his coming, the, Sun of real believers, the helper of religion, Mu‘în al-dîn, the darkness of unbelief in this land was illumined by the light of Islam.

That is how fanatic he was. No understanding of sublime ideology of Vedic dharm. Pure bigotry and fanaticism. Also notice how idol worshipping is being abhorred and still Kaba is being praised. Is it not idolatory?

Dargah is a Hindu temple

In fact the dargah is built on  the site of a grand Hindu temple:
There is evidence, more reliable than the tradition recorded in the Siyar al-Aqtãb, to suggest that this was the case in Ajmer. Sculpted stones, apparently from a Hindu temple, are incorporated in the Buland Darwãza of Mu‘în al-dîn’s shrine. Moreover, his tomb is built over a series of cellars which may have formed part of an earlier temple… A tradition, first recorded in the ‘Anis al-Arwãh, suggests that the Sandal Khãna is built on the site of Shãdî Dev’s temple
P.M.Currie
The records in Siyar Al Aqtab are:

It is said that among those temples there was one temple to reverence which the Rãjã and all the infidels used to come, and lands had been assigned to provide for its expenditure. When the Khwãja settled there, every day his servants bought a cow, brought it there and slaughtered it and ate it…

“So when the infidels grew weak and saw that they had no power to resist such a perfect companion of God, they… went into their idol temples which were their places of worship. In them there was a dev, in front of whom they cried out and asked for help

That has been a practice throughout the Islamic period. The local population was terrorised by acts which were considered unthinkably cruel. Cow killing was considered to be the worst. This 'sufi saint' used cow slaughter to assert Islamic supremacy. How saintly? How compassionate? I feel like paying a visit to Ajmer.
The story furthe states that:

“…The dev who was their leader, when he saw the perfect beauty of the Khwãja, trembled from head to foot like a willow tree. However much he tried to say ‘Ram, Ram’, it was ‘Rahîm, Rahîm’ that came from his tongue… The Khwãja… with his own hand gave a cup of water to a servant to take to the dev… He had no sooner drunk it than his heart was purified of darkness of unbelief, he ran forward and fell at the Heaven-treading feet of the Khwãja, and professed his belief…

“The Khwãja said: ‘I also bestow on you the name of Shãdî Dev [Joyful Deval]’…

“…Then Shadî Dev… suggested to the Khwãja, that he should now set up a place in the city, where the populace might benefit from his holy arrival. The Khwãja accepted this suggestion, and ordered one of his special servants called Muhammad Yãdgîr to go into the city and set in good order a place for faqîrs. Muhammad Yãdgîr carried out his orders, and when he had gone into the city, he liked well the place where the radiant tomb of the Khwãja now is, and which originally belonged to Shãdî Dev, and he suggested that the Khwãja should favour it with his residence…

Thus, the temple was usurped and converted into a slaughtering place for cows.


That is how the truth stands folks.


On the same topic

Amir Khusro
Muhammad Ghaus
Sayyid Ali Hamdani