ANOTHER ONE FOR PROPHET

Let us see how Mohammad, the prophet and founder of Islam, got his seventh wife named Juwairiya. The Islamic evidence in this regard is very clear. I am quoting two universally accepted books of Islam.

Ibn 'Aun reported: I wrote to Nafi' inquiring from him whether it was necessary to extend (to the disbelievers) an invitation to accept (Islam) before making them in fight. He wrote (in reply) to me that it was necessary in the early days of Islam. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) made a raid upon Banu Mustaliq while they were unaware and their cattle were having a drink at the water. He killed those who fought and imprisoned others. On that very day, he captured Juwairiya bint al-Harith. Nafi' said that this tradition was related to him by Abdullah b. Umar who (himself) was among the raiding troops.

Sahih Muslim - Book 019, No. 4292

The same is also mentioned in another Hadith:

I wrote a letter to Nafi and Nafi wrote in reply to my letter that the Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day. Nafi said that Ibn 'Umar had told him the above narration and that Ibn 'Umar was in that army. 

Bukhari - Volume 3, Book 46, No. 717

These references from the most respected Islamic books should settle the fact that Juwairiya was captured in the raid and was taken by prophet Mohammad. In the similar manner he had taken another 'wife' named Safiya. 

Let us get back to the tragedy that had befallen upon Juwairiya and the raid which changed her life, forever. It had been a very productive raid on the Jews. According the Biography of Mohammad, after the raid on the hapless Jews, enormous booty was captured:

Two hundred families, 2,000 camels, and 5,000 sheep and goats, besides much household goods, formed the booty. It was divided in the usual manner.

'The life of Mahomet' by William Muir. pp 287

Some of my readers might not have understood the import of the words 'usual manner'. 

It so happens that Mohammad had built around himself, a group of men, with the promise that Allah had given permission to Muslims to loot and plunder 'others'. These 'others' covered and still covers all those who are not Muslims. On top of that, Allah wanted the Muslims to plunder the 'others' and take their women, children and property for themselves. 

This plunder or war booty is called 'ghanima' (the same word which is loosely used in our part of world as ग़नीमत) in Quran. This made accepting the new religion, Islam, very attractive for some men of the nearby tribes. The importance of 'ghanima' was very clear to Mohammad, that is why, there is one complete chapter dedicated to the 'war booty' or ghanima. It is also called Anfal. This chapter 8 of Quran is called 'Al Anfal'. The first verse of the chapter is:

(ऐ रसूल) तुम से लोग अनफाल (माले ग़नीमत) के बारे में पूछा करते हैं तुम कह दो कि अनफाल मख़सूस ख़ुदा और रसूल के वास्ते है तो ख़ुदा से डरो (और) अपने बाहमी (आपसी) मामलात की इसलाह करो और अगर तुम सच्चे (ईमानदार) हो तो ख़ुदा की और उसके रसूल की इताअत करो 

Farooq Khan and Nadwi

They ask you O dear Prophet (Mohammed – peace and blessings be upon him) concerning the war booty; say, “Allah and the Noble Messenger are the owners of the war booty; so fear Allah and maintain friendship among yourselves; and obey Allah and His Noble Messenger, if you have faith." 

Ahmed Raza Khan

Here, it is pertinent to mention that Ahmed Raza Khan is one of the most respected Islamic scholars. So much so that the government of India has released a postage stamp bearing his name. Now about the chapter in Quran.

Thus, the revelation of this chapter, made plundering a 'holy' deed, exclusively for Muslims. Remember Mohammad Ghauri, Gaznawi, Babar, Balban, Aurangzeb, Nadir Shah.They came here for our wealth and our women. The intent was Jihad. The attraction was women and plunder. Out of this plunder, 20% is for the Prophet. After death of Mohammad, this 20% share went to Khalifa. This is the 'usual manner' of distribution of women and property (read about Hindu women sent to Khalifa here). This is also mentioned in Quran.

And know that whatever you take as war booty, a fifth of that belongs to Allah and His Noble Messenger, and to relatives, and orphans, and the needy, and the traveller – if you have accepted faith in Allah and what We sent down to Our bondman on the decisive day – the day when two armies had met; and Allah is Able to do all things.

Ahmed Raza Khan - Chapter 8, Verse 41

The sanction of Allah is also mentioned in Quran:

Therefore benefit from the war booty that you have received, lawful and good; and  fear Allah; indeed Allah is most Forgiving, Most Merciful. 

Quran 8:69

Do not be shocked. The Most merciful Allah has said that the Muslims can benefit from the booty because it is 'lawful and good'. Can Allah like looting of innocents, plundering and raping of women?

Here is what Quran says about captive women:

Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess.

Quran  - 4:24

Anyway, I guess that gives you a fair idea of the 'usual manner' of distributing the booty by 'prophet' and 'his' men.

The Biographer of Mohammad, William Muir, tells us about the distribution of booty collected in the attack on Jewish tribe of Bani Mustaliq.

The household stuff was sold to the highest bidder. In the division a camel was reckoned equal to ten sheep or goats. Each horseman had three times the share of a footman, two being reckoned for the horse. Mahomet desired by this rule to encourage the development of cavalry in his army.

Mind you, he wrote this biography more then a century ago and has not been disputed by any Islamic scholar. The reason is that the information is authentic.

Now, try to think about a beautiful girl of twenty years, married to a young man who is the chief of the tribe. One fine morning, the tribe is raided, her husband is killed and she is wedded to the murderer of her husband.

Can any woman accept such a person as her new 'husband'?

Well, the apologists of Islam say so. They want us to believe that Juwairiyah became a very devout follower of Islam and spent a large part of her day in prayers. So much so that whenever Mohammad came to her, he found her praying. 

Mohammad suggested to her a shorter way of praying. He told her to say:

subhaana allahe 'adada khalqihi, subhana allahe ridhaa nafsehe, subhana allahe zinata 'arshehe, subhana allahe zinata 'arshehe,subhana allah midadda kalimaatihi.

According to Mohammad, these words would be 'heavier in the scale than what she had done'. It means  - Praise Allah as many times as number of his creatures, and as much as pleases him, and as much as the weight of his throne, and as much as the ink for his words.

Some who do not believe in Islam say that continous praying was a tactic adopted by the young woman to avoid having sex with Mohammad. Mohammad being the wiser suggested her a shortcut to decrease her time of prayers. If these words are so miraculous then why Muslims all over the world have to spend so much time, five times a day.

If it is true, we will never know.

KILL THE HUSBAND, GET HIS WIFE

अग्निदाह गर्दश्चैव शास्त्रपानिर्धनापहः

क्षेत्र दार हरश्चैव  स देते आतातायीनः

which means

' आग लगाने वाला , विष खिलाने वाला , मारने के उद्देश्य से शस्त्र हाथ में लेकर आने वाला , दूसरे के धन का अपहरण करने वाला , दूसरे की जमीन पर कब्जा करने वाला तथा परायी स्त्री का अपहरण करने वाला आततायी होता है;

i.e. a terrorist or a gangster is one who 

either 'sets fire' (to other's properties), 

or poisons others, 

or weilds a weapon with an intent to kill, 

or takes others money, 

or forcibly possesses others land 

or who forcibly takes others woman.

This is the Hindu view of terrorism or gangsterism.

Those, who committed such detestable acts of terrorism were termed as 'mlechh' or म्लेच्छ.

Since diversity is the law of nature, such people have always existed, they exist today and will exist in future also. 

On the other end of this spectrum of diversity are creeds which not only endorse such acts but have survived and thrived on such acts. We are talking of men, for whom, raping others wives, keeping women as sex slaves, killing innocent men just because they did not approve their ideas, was a routine task. Somehow, by the perversion of political and educational system, they have been portrayed as prophets, saints or other pious men.

The presented incident took place in the year 628 A.D.

Mohammad, the prophet and founder of Islam was living in Yathreeb (present day Medina) and had tasted a lot of success in his raids that he was carrying out on the Caravans which used to travel through the nearby routes. He had become considerable famous and rich but so far, he had not captured Mecca. Mecca temple contained about 360 idols which were worshiped by the residents of Mecca and a large population of surrounding region.

He had six wives and two concubines in his Harem by now. In this story, we will talk about the next one to be inducted into his harem.

This beautiful seventeen years young girl was married to the chief of her Jewish tribe, living in Khaibar. This place was located at about 100 miles from Yathreeb. A few years earlier, she had been living with her father and other tribesmen, close to Yathreeb, from where Mohammad had ordered the whole tribe to exile. So, Khaibar was a new place, where they had settled. A couple of years ago, her father, Huway had been killed by Mohammad's Muslims on command of Mohammad. Her husband, a young man called Kinana was the chief of their tribe now. His grandfather had also been killed by Mohammad. Thus, the young couple had suffered exile and death of their near and dear ones at the hands of their common oppressor, Mohammad. It was to happen again, with much more cruelty and this time it was to be even more deadly.

Normally, history can be tricky but in case of Mohammad, most of his actions and words have been collected into books called 'Hadis'. Hadis means tradition. The importance of these books can be assessed from the fact that they are considered almost as sacred as Quran by Muslims. The six most authentic are known as 'sihaah sittah' or 'six books'. One of these is 'Sahih Bukhari'. Here is what it says:

Anas said, 'When Allah's Apostle invaded Khaibar, we offered the Fajr prayer there yearly in the morning) when it was still dark. The Prophet rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding behind Abu Talha. The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet . He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. When he entered the town, he said, 'Allahu Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. Whenever we approach near a (hostile) nation (to fight) then evil will be the morning of those who have been warned.' He repeated this thrice. The people came out for their jobs and some of them said, 'Muhammad (has come).' (Some of our companions added, "With his army.") We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and said, 'O Allah's Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.' The Prophet said, 'Go and take any slave girl.' He took Safiya bint Huyai. A man came to the Prophet and said, 'O Allah's Apostles! You gave Safiya bint Huyai to Dihya and she is the chief mistress of the tribes of Quraiza and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.' So the Prophet said, 'Bring him along with her.' So Dihya came with her and when the Prophet saw her, he said to Dihya, 'Take any slave girl other than her from the captives.' Anas added: The Prophet then manumitted her and married her."

Thabit asked Anas, "O Abu Hamza! What did the Prophet pay her (as Mahr)?" He said, "Her self was her Mahr for he manumitted her and then married her." Anas added, "While on the way, Um Sulaim dressed her for marriage (ceremony) and at night she sent her as a bride to the Prophet . So the Prophet was a bridegroom and he said, 'Whoever has anything (food) should bring it.' He spread out a leather sheet (for the food) and some brought dates and others cooking butter. (I think he (Anas) mentioned As-SawTq). So they prepared a dish of Hais (a kind of meal). And that was Walrma (the marriage banquet) of Allah's Apostle ."

Volume 1, Book 8, Number 367

Shocking stuff. 

What it tells us is that after the battle, the women of the slain men were picked as trophies and the 'prophet' had the prerogative of cherry picking out of the hapless women.  Using women as sex toys. It is precisely what was followed by Islamic invaders, all over the world. This is the 'sunnah' of Islam which is to be followed by all Muslims. Sufis, who are portrayed to be lesser fanatic followers of Islam also followed the prophet in all respect. Here is one example.The proud Hindu women, who were used to living a respectable life had come to know about such practices thus they preferred 'immolation' over molestation, the genesis of 'sati pratha'. Those who were unlucky ended up satisfying the lust of monsters.

Back to the story of Safiya. If you are uninformed, you will be deceived to believe that the prophet was a kind hearted man who married widows out of piety.

The fact is that this seventeen old is 'married' to a man fit to be his grandfather. She is supposed to be beneficiary of the magnanimity of the 'prophet' because he manumitted her from slavery. 

Easy, isn't it? Attack unaware tribe, kill the menfolk, chose the most good looking lass, enslave her. Wait for night, drag her to your bed and then show magnanimity that you are a gentle soul, who has released her from slavery. In fact, go a step further. Let your followers write in flowery language that you saved a poor woman from the clutches of slavery. The perfect script.

Oh, By the way, did I tell you about the fate of her husband. Here it is:

After this defeat, the citadel of Camuss surrendered, on condition that the inhabitants were free to leave the country, but that they should give up all their property to the conqueror. With the rest, came forth Kinana, chief of Kheibar, and his cousin. Mahomet accused them of keeping back, in contravention of the compact, some part of the treasure, and notably the marriage portion Kinana had obtained with his bride Safia, whose father perished in the slaughter of the Coreitza. ' Where are the vessels of gold,' he asked further, ' the vessels ye used to lend to the people of Mecca ? ' They protested that they no longer possessed them. ' If ye conceal anything from me,' said Mahomet, ' and I should gain knowledge of it, then your lives and the lives of your families shall be at my disposal.' They answered that it should be so. A recreant Jew, having divulged to Mahomet the place in which some of the valuables lay hid, he sent and fetched them. On their appearance, Kinana was subjected to cruel torture,—' fire being placed upon his breast till his breath had almost departed,'—in the hope that he would confess where the remainder was concealed. Mahomet then gave command, and the heads of both chief and cousin were severed from their bodies.

'Life of Mahomet' by William Muir. pp 362

So, that is how the poor young Safiya became a widow. And the apostle 'married' her because he was merciful. Can you believe it?

Today, the apologists of Islam try to give all sort of stupid reasons to justify such behavior. But it was not always so. For more then thousand years, Islamic invaders felt proud in imitating the behavior of this prophet. Millions of Hindu women (not thousands) were kidnapped and forcibly 'married' to Muslims. Most of the Muslims in our country today are the generations of such victims.

If you think that is enough of blood and cruelty, here is more.

The prophet had a big Negro named Bilal as his servant. After the husband of Safiya had been killed after torture, he sent Bilal to get Safiya, probably after Dihya had picked her out of the other women. William Muir tells us further about the cruelty.

On this, Bilal was sent to fetch Kinana's bride, Safia, a damsel some seventeen years of age, whose beauty was probably well known at Medina. He speedily performed his errand, and finding her with her cousin, brought them both across the battlefield strewed with the dead, and close by the corpses of Kinana and his cousin. At the ghastly sight, Safia's companion screamed wildly, beating her face, and casting dust upon her head. 'Take that she-devil hence,' said Mahomet, angrily : but aside he chided Bilal for his want of consideration in taking them by the bodies of their relatives. ' Truly,' said the heartless negro, ' I did it of purpose, to see their anger and their fright.' But Mahomet was moved by tenderer feelings; turning to Safia, he cast his mantle over her, in token that she was to be his own, and then made her over to the care of Bilal. One of his followers had coveted this Jewish beauty; but Mahomet contented him with her cousin.

The two women were carried over the dead bodies of their men folk, who had been tortured. Try to imagine the mental agony that Safiya would have suffered, looking at the headless body and severed head of her husband. His chest burnt due to the torture. 

The crying woman is a 'devil'. Why? Because she is mourning the murder of her relatives. That is coming from the 'prophet'.

Anyway, after a beautiful maid was hand picked by the prophet, her fate was sealed. That very night, she was 'married' to the 'prophet'.

Again, some apologists try to show that there was a prolonged time gap between the murder of her husband and 'marriage' to Mohammad. This becomes clear from the scene of the morning after the 'marriage'.

In the morning he heard the noise of one rustling at the curtain of the tent. It was Abu Ayub, who had kept watch there all night with his drawn sword. 'What has brought thee here?' asked Mahomet, surprised at the inopportune presence of his friend : 'O Prophet !' he replied, ' I bethought me that the damsel is young ; it is but as yesterday that she was married to Kinana, whom thou hast slain. And thus, distrusting her, I said to myself, I will watch thy tent and be close at hand, in case she attempt anything against thee.'

Abu Ayub, feared that the poor girl might try to take revenge of her slain husband.

Whether one should empathize with the poor woman or feel that she has been given 'respect' of being the wife of prophet will depend on the level of hypocrisy or indoctrination received. 

Such behavior should deserve respect or scrutiny?
Is this why there is a law about blasphemy of the prophet in Pakistan.

Next time someone tells you that the prophet married widows out of piety, you should ask about the killer of their husbands. That will give a clearer picture.

Well, that is the story of one of the wives of prophet. Some others also shared the same fate. For more on the interaction of the prophet with his wives, you might read this.

HINDU TERROR: THE OXYMORON

Before I move on to the fiction, let us look at some real hard facts.

Does the name Safdar Nagori ring a bell? 

No, he is the General Secretary of SIMI. 

Now, does the bell ring?

If still no, then SIMI is Student's Islamic Movement of India. It is a Muslim organisation, which was banned by Government of India (of course, Sonia was not on the scene then). Its objectives are

• liberation of India, so that it can be converted into Darul Islam, i.e. land of Islam.
• Convert everyone into a Muslim by force or kill him/her.
• regulating life on the basis of Quran instead of Constitution of India
• Propagation of Islam
• Jehad for Islam

Exactly what Quran prescribes as the duty of all Muslims. This 'nice misguided youth' was arrested in March 2008, from Indore, Madhya Pradesh. He has confessed during his narco analysis (link) that:

In the Samjhauta Express blasts, some persons from Pakistan had come and they had purchased the suitcase cover at Kataria Market, Indore. One person from (SIMI) Tanzeem had helped them to get the suitcase cover stitched. SIMI leader Abdul Razak had helped the Pakistanis in the Samjhauta Express blasts. Nagori also revealed that Razak had informed him beforehand about the Samjhauta Express blasts. Razak had sought the help of West Bengal SIMI president Misbah-ul-Islam for the Samjhauta explosions. Razak has a number of relatives in Pakistan, according to Nagori’s revelations. Kamruddin Nagori also concurred about Razak’s involvement in the Samjhauta Express blasts.

Kamruddin said during drug interrogation, “There were good relations between Safdar Nagori and Abdul Razak. Abdul Razak had discussed the Samjhauta Express blasts with Safdar Nagori.The banned outfit’s commander revealed that meetings were held by SIMI at Kurla, Kapadia Nagar and Mira Road in Mumbai for executing the terror attacks on Samjhauta Express and other blasts in the country.

For those who are unaware, on 18/02/2007, there were two blasts in Pakistan bound Samjhauta Express, near Panipat, which killed 68 persons. If we believe the sickular media, almost all of those killed were Pakistani Muslims, but the truth is that more Hindus were killed. These are small tricks which communist reporters have perfected to portray Muslims as poor victims at the receiving end from 'fascist' Hindus. Don't believe me, then take a look here or here.

So, this Nagori has spilled the beans that Samjhauta blasts were the handy work of home grown Islamic fundamentalists and our Pakistani Brothers. With such clear cut utterances, it would have been only a matter of time before the terror cells would have been arrested.

Our courts do not admit 'forced narco analysis' reports as valid evidence. The courts are of the opinion that it is unethical. Of course they are right. But then we are not discussing the ethics here. Are we?

Ethical or unethical, the purpose of the cops was served. Now, they had to find real hard evidence which would stand up in a court of law. The police resort to this trick to save them the trouble of scientific investigation. They normally resort to such short cuts to get the general drift and then start their leg work. But in this case, someone decided to turn the tale on its head. The religion of these perpetrators was to be swapped to tarnish Hindu religion. The same Hinduism about which Gandhi had said:

On examination, I have found it to be the most tolerant of all religions known to me. Its freedom from dogma makes a forcible appeal to me inasmuch as it gives the votary the largest scope for self-expression

Harijan -28/03/1936

Gandhi was spot on. He knew Hinduism very well. What he did not know was that he was harboring a monster, who would employ every possible trick to destroy that very Hinduism. Let us hear out Nehru also:

The spectacle of what is called religion, at any rate organized religion in India has filled me with horror, I have frequently condemned it, I would like to make a clean sweep of it. I want to completely destroy this religion and culture.

What a study in contrast! One by a thinker and the other by a megalomaniac.

Unfortunately, for our nation, today, it is the brood of this pervert that is calling the shots in our nation. The irony is that now the last name that they use is Gandhi. No wonder that Rahul G (remember 2G) finds Hindu fundamentalism a bigger threat then Islamic Jihad. He is fully supported by politicians, media and an army of NGOs to completely destroy this religion and culture.

The latest tool that they have invented is something called 'Hindu terror' or 'saffron terror'. Like any normal Hindu, I am irritated with the entire coterie of Nehru clan and their Yes men like PC for this sweeping statement. Anyway, look at the bold part of Nehru's statement. His unfinished agenda has been picked up by his gene pool.Thanks for permitting me the digression. Now back to Nagori and 'saffron terror'.

During the course of investigation, it was found out that one of the vehicles, used in Malegaon explosions, belonged to a woman called Pragya Singh Thakur. The ATS Mumbai went knocking on her door. She told the police that the said vehicle had been sold by her to one Sunil Joshi, who had been murdered in 2007. The ATS Mumbai took her into custody, illegal, that is. The aim was to establish that Hindu religion can also produce fanatic terrorists. As a result, her name and picture were flashed by the obliging media to establish ‘hindu terror’.

Before we move on further, let me remind you that we are talking of 'Hindu terror' or 'Saffron terror' here. Hardcore terrorists. Then Pragya Singh deserves to get the prize for being a terrorist, dumb enough to use her own vehicle in an act of 'saffron terror'. How cool and calculating terrorists are these saffron guys? Hai na?

Then started the horror tale for a sadhvi. She was kept into custody, in the absence of any woman police staff, physically and verbally abused and tortured. She was subjected to narco analysis and polygraph tests repeatedly. But, unlike Nagori, nothing incriminating was forthcoming. 

So what?

The reason given by ATS is that 'her meditation has helped her'. We should give them a prize for their ingenuity. Now, this ATS takes its orders from the same Vilas Rao Deshmukh whose name has been sent by German authorities as one of the account holders in tax haven countries where black money is stashed. This has been stated by none other then the Income tax commissioner of Mumbai Vishv Bandhu Gupta (now retired).

Moved by her plight, K.P.S. Gill, one of the most experienced police officers had to say that:

he had never seen such a prolonged remand for a woman, let alone a sadhvi.

But then, when he was a cop, he was dealing with real terrorism (just terrorism and not sikh terrorism because sikh scriptures do not promote terrorism), not fake one. Here the agenda is to blacken the most tolerant of religions so that an impression is created that Hinduism is also as predatory and intolerant as the other creeds. 

Apart from Pragya Singh Thakur, two more names are being very frequently displayed about. Lt. Col. Purohit and Aseemanand. All of them are said to be involved in, what are said to be acts of 'saffron terror'.

Now let us look at all the cases that are indicators of this 'Saffron terror'. They are Samjhauta train blast, Malegaon blast and Ajmer mecca masjid blast. 

Malegaon Blasts

On 08/09/2006, there were two or three blasts in this Maharashtra town, in which 37 persons were killed.

Samjhauta Express Blasts

Already explained above.

Mecca Masjid Blast, Hyderabad

On 18/05/2007, there was a blast near Charminar of Hyderabad, in which 9 persons were killed. When the local Muslims went on rampage, police resorted to firing, killing 5 persons.

Ajmer dargah blast

On 11/10/2007, a blast took place outside the dargah of a so called Sufi Moinuddeen Chishti (I will talk about him some other time) at Ajmer, Rajasthan. Three persons were killed due to the blast.

Now, what about the Malegaon blast, in which, ATS Mumbai say that Pragya Singh was involved and RDX was provided by Lt. Col. Purohit.

Let us hear it also from Nagori's report:

During the drug interrogation, Nagori revealed that SIMI has a strong presence in Maharashtra, including Malegaon, and he was “aware of the complicity of Muslims in the 2006 Malegaon blasts”.The 32-page narco analysis test report of Safdar Nagori, Kamruddin and Aamil Parzez quotes Nagori as having said, "In the Malegaon blasts (2006), some of the Muslim members were involved and that he (Nagori) was aware of it. SIMI members were involved in the Samjhauta Express train blasts."Nagori said, "The Maharashtra SIMI members were to take houses on rent to take shelter and to complete the tasks and targets given to them… They were often changing their hideouts." He admitted that some terrorists from Pakistan had also come to Mumbai and the entire SIMI network in Maharashtra was involved in the Samjhauta Express blasts.

Anyway, what does the media tell us about this case?

Well, there is a saying that:

Throw a lot of mud and some will stick.

Right now, this is being worked upon with clinical precision. It is not only Sadhvi Pragya or 'saffron terror'. Remember the 'confession' of Aseemanand? How, a court document was deliberately leaked to Prannoy James Roy and the likes of him?

Have you noticed the scroll on NDTV (Nehru Dynasty TV) and other such stooges continuously looping 'NIA to probe saffron terror cases' or some such crap?

This is the oldest tricks in the book of propagandists. And surprisingly, it is also the most effective when the audience is of lesser IQ. An oft repeated lie becomes accepted truth. They will keep on this scroll till it is subconscious internalized by impressionable minds. All of a sudden, the nation will be full of Zombies who will sincerely think that 'saffron terror' is a reality.

They are no more talking about Nagori. As far as some of these media crooks are considered, Nagori does not exist. It is only 'saffron terror'. Period.

SIMI is not only involved in all these 'saffron terror' cases but in other parts also. So, the color is not saffron but green. Sample this:

The report states, "He (Nagori) said Asif Khan from Maharashtra is his (Nagori's) friend and that he is involved in the Mumbai train blasts and the blast at Aurangabad. After the blasts, Abdul Subhan alias Tauqeer and Asif Khan had gone to Hafeez's house for hiding but did not find him at his place. Asif Khan met Tanvir and Yasir of Sholapur and they both arranged a hideout at Belgaum. Later, Asif was arrested from Belgaum."

The chargesheet in the Malegaon blasts (2006) case filed by the ATS, Mumbai, concedes the "extensive presence" of SIMI in Malegaon and the outfit's anti-India designs for waging a war against the Government.

All of us know that Abu Salem is not only a terrorist, he has a very well organized network, thus a fit case for MCOCA. But, he has been relieved of the charges under this act. On the other hand, Lt. Col. Purohit has been. How thoughtful of the ruling regime! That too when the army has categorically stated that he did not have access to RDX.

Now this serving officer was posted in J&K for military intelligence and was currently learning Arabic. Did he find out about the ugly face of vote bank community of the ruling regime? Who knows? Slapping MCOCA gives an indication about the eagerness to keep this man behind bars for as long as possible. 

Initially the media tom tommed that he supplied RDX which was used in some of these explosions. Now that the army has again stated that a person of the rank of Purohit does not handle explosives and moreover army does not store RDX, still the charade is being maintained.

Let us for a minute agree that all these individuals were involved in acts of terrorism and they did actually carried out some blasts and killed innocent persons. That makes them terrorists. But, But why call them Hindu terrorists. That can be done if they have taken their inspiration from some Hindu scripture like Islamic terrorists take their inspiration from Quran.

Since Quran explicitly talks about killing followers of other religions in the name of Jihad, therefore those terrorists are Islamic terrorists. But did these individuals say that the inspiration comes from Hindu scriptures. Absolutely not. No Hindu scripture asks its followers to kill innocent persons thus there can be no Hindu terror or Saffron terrorist.

Has any of them the guts to talk about 'Islamic Jehad' or 'Green terror'? 

Has Rahul, or any of his stooges been able to find anything of such violent nature in Hindu scriptures? 

Has any Hindu religious leader sanctioned the acts of terror, if any? 

Has any Hindu religious group taken the responsibility of any such act?

The answer to all the above questions is a resounding NO. 

Now, as the courts have refused to divulge the religion of Rahul(Raul Maino?), we have to resort to indirect sources. His mom Antonia Maino aka Sonia Gandhi is a Catholic Christian (even after marrying a man from different faith) and it so happens that in a nation of 2.5% Christians, his sister Priyanka could find a Christian to be her husband. May be it is just a coincidence. May be. We Hindus have not always been such suckers. We have had the ability to see through such coincidences. It is the education system imposed by Nehru that has turned us, a nation of Nanak, Shivaji, Rana Pratap, Udham Singh and Bismil, into a nation of Zombies. The uncorfimed reports say that he is also a Christian, even if he is not, he is surrounded by all Christian relatives. Probably, that is why he has a poor knowledge of Hinduism.

Anyway, What did Gandhi say about Christianity?

Gandhi wrote in his book Autobiography or the Story of My Experiments with Truth:

As "philosophically there was nothing extraordinary in Christian principles" no one, much less a Hindu, would ever give it a second look.

Christian Conversions and abuse of Religious Freedom in India - By Brahm Datt Bharti p. 20

This statement of his, might be painful to those souls who are devout Christians but do not know the difference between Hinduism and other religions. The Bhagwad Gita and Veds are worth reading. Some say that it is for his staunch support for Hinduism that Gandhi has not been given a Nobel prize. I don't know, I am just a Zombie. Not that he needs a Nobel, it is probably the other way round.

Once again, the philosopher and thinker that Gandhi was, he was spot on. That is why he said:

Whatever of substance is contained in any other religion is always to be found in Hinduism, and what is not contained in it is insubstantial or unnecessary

Harijan - 27/09/1925

How do you like that Rahul? Coming from the icon of your party. But then that is what he has been really reduced to. An icon. Nothing more. 

Let me expand his statement a little further. Sanatan dharm, Arya dharm, Vedic dharm or, as it is now called, Hindu dharm is the only religion which talks about non-violence being a virtue. All the other religions that talk about non violence are off shoots of this great dharm, which includes Buddhism. In fact Buddhism is a part of Hindu dharm. On the other hand, Islam and Christianity, have been the most violent ideologies.

Again I will quote Gandhi:

  I am a Hindu hence I Love not only human beings, but all living beings.

That is the essence of Hinduism. Love for all living beings, except monsters. Like Raavan, Duryodhan, Kans etc. The love goes beyond living beings. It extends to every aspect of nature. 

On the other hand are religions having intolerance and terror built into them. In fact, they are creeds. Creeds of Greed. They talk of Jihad and Crusade. They talk of converting or baptizing the infidels. They talk of killing the idolaters. They talk of Darul Harb or 'Kingdom of God'. As if right now it is kingdom of someone else. They have wiped out Roman, Greek, Pharao's, Egyptian, Mayan, Inca civilizations. The civilizations which were in harmony with nature. The civilizations which respected women. 

Hindu civilization is the only one left. The unfinished agenda. Before we were converted to Zombies by the missionary education system, we engaged them in a fierce resistance spanning more then 1300 years. The longest and bloodiest struggle in the annals of history. It is still going on. Not all have been hoodwinked by the facade of pseudo secularism propounded by these creeds. As Gandhi said:

Hinduism is a relentless pursuit of Truth. "Truth is God" and if today it has become moribund, inactive, irresponsive to growth, it is because we are fatigued; and as soon as the fatigue is over, Hinduism will burst upon the world with brilliance perhaps unknown before

Well, the fatigue is over. We are ready to shine with brilliance. 

Now, about terror and religion. Remember the biggest terrorist on our planet, who said:

Either you are with us, or you are with the them.

Oh yes. George Bush. We are told that he reads Bible daily.The very Bush who has ruined a whole country and killed its president in the most brazen acts of terror. In the name of 'weapons of mass destruction'. He did not coin the statement on his own. He took it out of Bible, Matthew 12:30.

Islamic terror or Jihad flows right out of Quran, therefore, it can be called Islamic terror. Likewise Fundamentalism was born out of Bible, therefore it is a Christian gift.

But no terror activity flows from Hindu scriptures. Still unfortunately for Hindus, the government, media and education are controlled by sworn enemies of Hinduism, thus we will see this bogey of ‘Saffron terror’ for a long time.

There has not been a single conviction from any 'court of law' despite the entire law and order machinery working overtime to implicate Hindus in an act of Islamic terror. And still the Zombie nation thinks that there is something called 'saffron terror'.

That speaks volumes about the level of intellect of the intellectuals.