HATRED FOR HINDU SYMBOLS BECOMES OFFICIAL

The following circular has been circulated by Shiney Thomas of Muthoot. It dictates the dress code for the employees of the firm. It is not only fundamentalist but also against our constitution.

The reason given for hatred for Bindi and Tilak is that the

dress should be formal, neat clean and generally acceptable.

Acceptable to whom?
The pope!
Maybe.

Is it surprising that the symbols of a old civilization are viewed with venomous hatred by imperialistic creeds?
Now that most of the urban and semi urban population has been secularized by the Christian controlled media and education of our nation, the next logical step is to gradually phase out Hindu symbols. Or at least make them feel guilty of them.
The final blow of Christianization will come a little later.

'Muthoot finance ' is a company owned by Catholic Christians, who are considered to be the most fundamentalist. All its directors are Catholic Christians.

One of its directors M.G.George Muthoot is a

member of the Managing Committee of Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church for over 31 years and is presently the lay trustee of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church and a member of the working committee of the Indian Orthodox Church. Recently, he was conferred the HH Baselios Mathew I Award by Catholicate of the Syrian Orthodox Church Mathews the First Foundation for the year 2008 for his services to the Church.

as claimed by the website of the company.

No wonder that he has contributed 22,00,000/- rupees to the church on the Catholicate day.

MAHATMA GANDHI'S RAPIST BROTHERS

The following is an extract from 'New India', written by Annie Beseant on 29/11/1921. These were the times when Mopla Muslims had killed thousands of Hindus and raped their women.

" It would be well if Mr. Gandhi be taken into Malabar to see with his own eyes the ghastly horror which have been created by his preaching and of his “loved brothers” Mohammed and Shaukat Ali. Mr. Gandhi asked the Moderates to compel the Government to suspend hostilities, i.e. to let loose the wolves to destroy what lives are left.  The Murderers, the looters, the ravishers have put into practice the teachings of paralyzing the Government by making war on the Government in their own way.

            How does Mr. Gandhi like the Mopla spirit, as shown by one of the prisoners in the hospital, who was dying from the results of asphyxiation?  He asked the surgeon, if he was going to die and the surgeon answered that he feared he would not recover. “Well, I am glad that I killed 14 infidels” said the ‘Brave, God-fearing Mopla’, whom Mr. Gandhi so much admires who “are fighting for what they consider” as religion, and in a manner they consider as religious”.  Men who consider it “religious” to murder, rape, loot, to kill women and little children, cutting down whole families, have to be put under restraint in any civilized society.

            Mr. Gandhi was shocked when some Parsi ladies had their saris torn on, and very properly, yet the God fearing hooligans had been taught that it was sinful to wear foreign cloth, and doubtless felt they were doing a religious act; can he not feel a little sympathy for thousands of women left with only rage, driven from home, for little children born of the dying mothers on roads in refugee camps ?  The misery is beyond description.  Girl wives, pretty and sweet, with eyes half blind with weeping, distraught with terror, women who have seen their husbands hacked to pieces before their eyes, in the way “Moplas consider as religious”, old women tottering, whose faces become written with anguish and who cry at a gentle touch and a kind look waking out of a stupor of misery only to weep, men who have lost all - hopeless, crushed, desperate.  I have walked among thousands of them in the refuge camps, and some times heavy eyes would lift as a cloth was laid gently on the bare shoulder and a faint watery smile of surprise would make the face even more piteous than the stupor.  Eyes full of appeal, of agonized despair, of hopeless entreaty, of helpless anguish, thousands of them camp after camp, “Shameful inhumanity proceeding in Malabar “says Mr. Gandhi Shameful inhumanity indeed. Wrought by the Moplas, and where are the victims, saved from extermination by British and India swords. For be it remembered the Moplas began the whole home business; the Government intervened to save their victims and these thousands have been saved.  Mr. Gandhi would have hostility suspended – so that the Moplas may sweep down on the refugee camps, and finish their work”.

            Let me finish within beautiful story told to me. Two Pulayas the lowest of the submerged classes, were captured with others and given the choice between Islam and Death.  These, the outcast of Hinduism, the untouchables, so loved the Hinduism which had been so unkind a step-mother to them, that they chose to die Hindus rather than to live Muslim.  May the God of both, Muslim and Hindus send his messengers to these heroic souls, and give them rebirth into the faith for which they died."

 To get the first hand information about the atrocities that were heaped on Hindu women, one must read the petition of Malabar ladies written to lady reading.
The media crooks and marxists are trying to portray these ghastly incidents as a revolution by Muslims.

I AM NOT 'IMAANDAAR'.

The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.

Historian Will Durant

आर्यपुत्र OR अनाड़ी

The extent upto which our civilization has been undermined can be gauged from one single word used by almost every person living in truncated India. It is so deep rooted that the first impulse is to justify it with false arguments. As if it would change the truth. 

The word is Imaandaar or ईमानदार. It is used by Hindus for anyone who is honest. The irony is that for close to 1000 years this word has meant and still means the exact opposite of Hindus.

When India had not been ravaged by islamic invaders, there was no such word in use by Hindus. Any upright, uncorrupted, honest and conscientious man was referred to as 'आर्य' (Arya) or आर्यपुत्र (son of Arya). 

Like wise, an unworthy person was referred to as अनार्य. For example, in Bhagwad Geeta, Chapter 2, verse 2, योगेश्वर श्रीकृष्ण (Yogeshwar Shri Krishn) rebukes Arjun by telling his behaviour to be like that of an अनार्य. With passage of time अनार्य has been corrupted into अनाड़ी.

ईमानदार

ईमान (Imaan) is an arabic word which means 'belief in Allah' and ईमानदार means 'one who believes in Allah'.

When Islamic bigots took control of Hindustan, the Islamic law system Shari'a was imposed within the region under Islamic rule. According to Shari'a, islam is the only true religion and all other religions are false. As a consequence, anyone who does not believe in Islam is either slaughtered, or is given the option of becoming a Muslim. Then there is a third option of becoming a Zimmi. Which means that the person can is allowed to live in a Muslim state without changing his/her religion by paying a humiliating tax Jizya. 

A major debilitation for a Zimmi was that he was not considered worthy of even being a witness because he did not belong to the 'only true religion'. As a result he/she was बेईमान or 'beimaan' i.e. one without faith in Allah. 

Now, according to shari'a, one who is not a muslim, can not be honest. Thus in official parlance, he could not be trusted by virtue of being बेईमान. The consequence was that every Hindu was and is still बेईमान. For all those centuries when Islam held its sway in our vast motherland, Hindus were treated as scum by the ईमानदार or the ones with faith in Allah. 

The best source of this information can be found in Quran, which is full of derogatory views about all non muslims. Let us take a look. The English translation is taken from the one rendered by Hilali and Khan because it is considered to be the most authentic and is distributed by the Saudi Government to the haj travellers. The Hindi translation is by Farooq Khan and Nadwi.

9:28

ऐ ईमानदारों मुशरेकीन* तो निरे नजिस** हैं 

O you who believe (in Allah's Oneness and in His Messenger (Muhammad SAW)! Verily, the Mushrikun* (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, and in the Message of Muhammad SAW) are Najasun** (impure). So let them not come near Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at Makkah) after this year, and if you fear poverty, Allah will enrich you if He will, out of His Bounty. Surely, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.

*Mushrikun or मुशरेकीन means polytheists, pagans, idolaters which definitely Hindus are.

**The term Najasun or नाजिस means hateful. Hindus are one of the Najis things in Islam.

Islam divided the humanity into muslims and non muslims. Muslims are ordained to fight the non muslims till all have been converted to islam or killed.

[8:15]

ऐ ईमानदारों जब तुमसे कुफ्फ़ार से मैदाने जंग में मुक़ाबला हुआ तो (ख़बरदार) उनकी तरफ पीठ न करना 

O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve, in a battle-field, never turn your backs to them.  

Those who do not have 'faith in allah' are to be burnt as the verse 55 of chapter 4 tells us.

[4:55] 

फिर कुछ लोग तो इस (किताब) पर ईमान लाए और कुछ लोगों ने उससे इन्कार किया और इसकी सज़ा के लिए जहन्नुम की दहकती हुई आग काफ़ी है 

Of them were (some) who believed in him (Muhammad SAW), and of them were (some) who averted their faces from him (Muhammad SAW); and enough is Hell for burning (them). 

Those who say that Islam is a 'religion of peace' are unable to see the Jihadi verses like verse 111 of chapter 9.

[9:111]

निस्संदेह अल्लाह ने ईमानवालों से उनके प्राण और उनके माल इसके बदले में खरीद लिए है कि उनके लिए जन्नत है। वे अल्लाह के मार्ग में लड़ते है, तो वे मारते भी है और मारे भी जाते है। यह उनके ज़िम्मे तौरात, इनजील और क़ुरआन में (किया गया) एक पक्का वादा है। और अल्लाह से बढ़कर अपने वादे को पूरा करनेवाला हो भी कौन सकता है? अतः अपने उस सौदे पर खुशियाँ मनाओ, जो सौदा तुमने उससे किया है। और यही सबसे बड़ी सफलता है 

Verily, Allah has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allah's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Quran. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success.  

The fight has to be fought with cruelty towards the non muslims.

[9:123]

ऐ ईमानदारों कुफ्फार में से जो लोग तुम्हारे आस पास के है उन से लड़ों और (इस तरह लड़ना) चाहिए कि वह लोग तुम में करारापन महसूस करें और जान रखो कि बेशुबहा ख़ुदा परहेज़गारों के साथ है

O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who are the Al-Muttaqun

Although the verses against non muslims are spread over almost the entire Quran, chapter 47 deals almost exclusively with hatred towards non muslims.

Today, Hindus instead of claiming to be आर्य or आर्यपुत्र claim themselves to be ईमानदार. It is upto Historians to find when and how this term came to be used by Hindus. It definitely not being used by Hindus till the time of Shivaji. 

Whether it is also one of the polluting results of Nehruvian propaganda through education system and movies should be an interesting research.

Today onwards, I am a proud बेईमान, a proud आर्यपुत्र, a proud सनातनी हिन्दू.

IDOLATORY - SWAMI VIVEKANAND AND BIBLE

Listen to these words of Swami Vivekanand.

It has become a trite saying that idolatry is wrong and every man swallows it without questioning. I once thought so, and to pay the penalty of that I had to learn my lesson sitting at the feet of a man who realised everything through idols. I allude to Ramakrishna Paramahamsa. If such Ramakrishna Paramahamsas are produced by idol-worship, what will you have - the reformer’s creed or any number of idols? I want an answer. 

Take a thousand idols more if you can produce Ramakrishna Paramahamsas through idol-worship, and may God speed you! Produce such noble natures by any means you can. 

Yet idolatry is condemned! Why? Nobody knows. 

Because some hundreds of years ago some man of Jewish blood happened to condemn it? That is, he happened to condemn everybody else’s idols except his own. If God is represented in any beautiful form or any symbolic form, said the Jew, it is awfully bad; it is sin. But if He is represented in the form of a chest, with two angels sitting on each side, and a cloud hanging over it, it is the holy of holies. If God comes in the form of a dove, it is holy. But if He comes in the form of a cow, it is heathen superstition; condemn it!

Like most of the urban youth of today, Swami Vivekanand (earlier name - Narender Nath) was a product of missionary school. The fact reflects in the earlier part of his statement. But he was strong and aware enough to get out of the fraud.

In the intervening period of more then a century, missionaries have tightened their grip over the Hindu psyche to such an extent that they take pride in being what the missionary schools and our education system wants them to be. Secular. 

The effect is so profound that something so base as Bible has started gaining acceptance as a 'holy' book. 

The classic case of 'An oft repeated lie becomes truth'.

Let us see in what tone the Bible talks about Hindus. Five hundred years ago, the term idolaters would have included Mayans and Incas also but they have been wiped out by Christians, only Hindus are left.

The following extract is from the New International Version of Bible. It is chapter 10 of 1 Corinthians, which is a part of the new testament.

1. For I do not want you to be ignorant of the fact, brothers and sisters, that our ancestors were all under the cloud and that they all passed through the sea.

2. They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea.

3. They all ate the same spiritual food

4. and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ.

5. Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them; their bodies were scattered in the wilderness.

(Are we talking about the God of mercy?)

6. Now these things occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did.

(It is like a teacher slapping Vijay to teach a lesson to Ajay)

7. Do not be idolaters, as some of them were; as it is written: “The people sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in revelry.”

8. We should not commit sexual immorality, as some of them did—and in one day twenty-three thousand of them died.

(The 'God' is taking pride in killing 23,000 of his own creation in a day)

9. We should not test Christ, as some of them did—and were killed by snakes.

(Can anyone even test God?)

10. And do not grumble, as some of them did—and were killed by the destroying angel.

(God acting as a bully?)

11. These things happened to them as examples and were written down as warnings for us, on whom the culmination of the ages has come.

12. So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall!

13. No temptation has overtaken you except what is common to mankind. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can endure it.

14. Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry.

(Why is this God so jealous of idolatry?)

15. I speak to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say.

16. Is not the cup of thanksgiving for which we give thanks a participation in the blood of Christ? And is not the bread that we break a participation in the body of Christ?

(Can drinking blood and eating flesh be considered civilized?)

17. Because there is one loaf, we, who are many, are one body, for we all share the one loaf.

18. Consider the people of Israel: Do not those who eat the sacrifices participate in the altar?

19. Do I mean then that food sacrificed to an idol is anything, or that an idol is anything?

20. No, but the sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God, and I do not want you to be participants with demons.

(Who created these demons? Were they created by God?)

21. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons too; you cannot have a part in both the Lord’s table and the table of demons.

22. Are we trying to arouse the Lord’s jealousy? Are we stronger than he?

23. “I have the right to do anything,” you say—but not everything is beneficial. “I have the right to do anything”—but not everything is constructive.

24. No one should seek their own good, but the good of others.

25. Eat anything sold in the meat market without raising questions of conscience,

26. for, “The earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it.”

27. If an unbeliever invites you to a meal and you want to go, eat whatever is put before you without raising questions of conscience.

28. But if someone says to you, “This has been offered in sacrifice,” then do not eat it, both for the sake of the one who told you and for the sake of conscience.

29. I am referring to the other person’s conscience, not yours. For why is my freedom being judged by another’s conscience?

30. If I take part in the meal with thankfulness, why am I denounced because of something I thank God for?

31. So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God.

32. Do not cause anyone to stumble, whether Jews, Greeks or the church of God—

33. even as I try to please everyone in every way. For I am not seeking my own good but the good of many, so that they may be saved.

One can derive the conclusion that these are rumblings of some barbaric man claiming to be God, or can think otherwise!

ANNA & UPA: WHO IS HELPING WHO?

First of all let us take a reality check.

When Ramdev decided to sit on a satyagrah, the preparations like cleaning of the Ramlila ground was carried out by his volunteers. On the other hand, MCD did its best to clean up the ground for Anna to conduct his Satyagrah.
When Ramdev made his arrangements, the media had started defaming by hyping up terms like 'five star anshan' but when it came to Anna, the media almost deified him.

The disgraceful manner in which Swami Ramdev was treated by 'team Anna' is a pointer in the direction this charade is taking place. To understand the flow, one has to go back to the same Ramlila ground.

The date was 27 February, 2011. Swami Ramdev had asssembled not only about one lakh of his followers but also Anna, Kiran Bedi, Arvind Kejriwal, Agnivesh, Ramjethmalani, Khairnar and Vishv Bandhu Gupta (former IT commissioner of Mumbai, who was a key person in arrest of notorious Hasan Ali). Not many knew Anna at that time. Not outside Maharashtra, that is. Anna and his team were all humility in front of Ramdev, whose dias they were using to further themselves. Soon they were to dump Swami Ramdev. Here is Anna, humility personified.



Till this time, Anna had been almost a nobody at the national level. But it all changed on April 4, 2011, when Anna caught the imagination of the nation by sitting at Jantar Mantar for his fast in support of Jan lokpal bill.
That unprecedented coverage changed the humble Anna. This change of nature should be seen in light of what Yogesh Pratap singh, a former top cop of Mumbai has said about Anna. Y.P.Singh was one of the first IPS officers of the country who had the courage to join Anna in 2003, while still in service. According to him: (read the entire article here or here for more serious issues with Anna)

I have been seeing for the past 8 years of my association with Anna, he is one person who gets impressed by the colour of authority. If a senior politician or minister calls up, he gets overwhelmed. One can never fight against an authority if you get impressed by his stature. His praise for Sonia Gandhi is one such example. The effect of this praise was like a pronouncement of a PR person trying to show that a corrupt government was honest.

Therein lies the key. Praising Antonia Maino. While Ramdev had been hitting hard against Sonia and Italian banks, Anna was smart enough not to ruffle the unofficial boss of the UPA. On June 5, the Delhi Police had barbarically and unconstitutionally crushed Ramdev's satyagrah. Anna and his team were smart enough to conduct a solidarity satyagrah on June 8 at Jantar mantar.
The very next day, Anna played his ace. He wrote a letter to Antonia informing her that he had put condition on Ramdev that there should be no politicians or communal persons on the stage if Ramdev wants Anna's support.

Playing from both sides!

That must have clinched it for Anna.
Let us try to think from the perspective of Antonia Maino and all the other corrupt persons having millions stashed in secret banks.

On one side is Baba Ramdev. Asking for their money to be brought back to India and he wants it to be declared National Property, which it definitely is. Not only that, he had the guts to oppose the draconian 'Prevention of communal and targeted violence bill', which Anna or his team mates will never dare to challenge.

On the other hand is Anna, who is asking for passing of a bill which will lead to formation of a new institution. Congress has all the expertise of jeopardizing such institutions. That is if it comes down to creating one. CVC, CAG and CBI are cases in point.  Asking for autonomy of these already existing institutes would not have looked so dramatic to the middle class of the nation. Secondly, unlike the formidable Bharat Swabhiman organization of Swami Ramdev, Anna has no organization for grass root mobilization. The day cameras are turned away from him, he will be out of hair of the authorities. Thirdly, desipite his bravado, Anna gives undue importance to Antonia, which is in direct opposition to the openly defiant stand of Baba Ramdev.

All in all, Anna suits the plans of UPA perfectly well. Enhancing his stature by using ever subservient media and ridiculing Ramdev has been a master stroke. Public is savouring the feel good factor as their anger has been pent up in the fortnight of slogan mongering, which augurs well for the government. Steamed out populace is easier to control then one which is charged up.

In nutshell, government has given away nothing, has released the pressure cooker like situation of the nation and, at least for the time being, pushed Baba Ramdev into an obscure corner.

Ours is the nation, where three inimical evil forces Evangelists, Maoists, Marxists and Islamic Jihadists have joined hands for its disintegration. All of them denounce the traditional values and culture and are patently anti Hindu. Let us look at this 'axis of evil'.

Look at the image below. The important part is name of the organization on the placard displayed here. It is one Jagruk Nagrik Suraksha Sangathan being run by one Denson Joseph.

NiceThis Denson Joseph is the standard specimen which are loved by Antonia. Here is what he has to say:

I strongly feel that the Gujarat riots, the heartless rapes of the children, women during these riots gave birth to the so called Islamic terrorism...If Gujarat created islamic terrorists then I sincerely hope against hope that kandhamal (Orissa), Belgaum(Karnataka) & now Nedumbassery (in Kerala) do not create christian terrorists in the country.

Hmmm. Typical Fundamentalist Christian stuff.

Hey Denson! Have you seen the refugee camps of Kashmiri Hindus. They are like ghettos. All of them are victims of Jihad, which is enshrined in islamic scriptures. Islamic bigots raped their women, killed their men and tortured their children. This dastardly terrorism started in 1989. Much before Gujarat.

Anyway, he is one of such bigots whom Anna cares for. At least, it seems to be so.

The picture below shows a pic of Gandhi as background for Anna's fast at Ramlila ground. In April, the background was different.

It was a picture of Bharat Mata. One which millions of our countrymen adore. Anna changed the backdrop to pacify Antonia's pet poodle Harsh Mander, Maoists and leftist politicians. Read the story here.

Had he not used the picture from the beginning, it would not have made a difference. But removing Bharat Mata because some rascal sees some perversion in it is height of hypocrisy. 

For someone who claims to be non communal, this sure looks like a strange move. 

Even more shameless was the response of Kiran Bedi and Arvind Kejriwal, who went to pacify Shahi Imam Bukhari when this rabidly fundamental Mullah asked Muslims to remain aloof from the movement for some equally stupid reasons. The reason might be the clout that Bukhari has with Antonia.This little drama will help you understand the 'secular' angle of the entire sham game.

When a Danish cartoonist had drawn portraits of Islamic prophet Mohammad, Bukhari, like a typical bigot got hyper and went weeping to Antonia, who was all sympathy for such an 'atrocity'. Here is what she shared with Bukhari:

‘I have received your letter and share your sense of outrage about the publication of insensitive cartoons of the Prophet. The United Progressive Alliance government has conveyed its strong sentiments to the government of Denmark through the Indian and Danish ambassadors in our respective countries,’ the letter said.

What a load of rubbish. That is how strong and 'sickular' Anna and his team is folks.

The extent upto which Team Anna and media went to ensure that Swami Ramdev should not get highlighted can be gauged from the fact that the news of death of 'Arun K Das' of Bharat Swabhiman trust was blacked out by media and Anna or his team did not even acknowledge the death of a patriot.

We are all familiar with the martyrdom of Bhagat singh and how Nehru enjoyed the perks. Will we learn? Ever?