One of the most sincere and honest historians of our country, Shri Sita Ram Goel has catalogued about 2,000 temples (Hindu temples: What happened to them - 2) demolished in our country by Islamic monsters to erect Mosques on them. He acknowledges that it is a partial list. After listing the attacks by Islamic monsters on Gujarat, this is what he has to say about the Hindus.
The only conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence is that either the Hindus of Gujarat had a very short memory or that they did not understand at all the inspiration at the back of these invasions. The temple of Somnath which stood, after the invasion of Mahmûd of Ghazni in AD 1026, as a grim reminder of the character of Islam, had also failed to teach them any worthwhile lesson. Nor did they visualize that the Muslim settlements in their midst could play a role other than that of carrying on trade and commerce.The foreign merchants turned Muslims had continued to do business and amass wealth as in the earlier days. But the leadership in the Muslim settlements had now passed into the hands of the missionaries of Islam known as Sufis, Walîs, Dirvishes and by several other high-sounding names. The sole occupation of these missionaries was to see the frontiers of Dãr al-Islãm extend towards Gujarat. All Muslims in Gujarat were now expected to serve as the eyes and ears of the Caliphate which had started on a career of imperialist aggression in all directions. Gujarat had had a taste of this aggression earlier than any other part of India. As the armies of Islam marched towards the land frontiers of India in Makran and Seistan, Indian ports on the West Coast became targets for the newly created Islamic navy.
My focus is on two points in this conclusion. Firstly, that it applies to the Hindus all over our country. They have become so moronic that they are unable to see the real face of this creed. Secondly, the inherent good nature of Hindus has turned them into morons who try to paint a 'saintly' image of Sufis.
As rightly said by Sh. Sita Ram Goel, the bigots, who are nowadays called sufis had a fancy for long and fancy names. Look at the full name of a sufi 'saint' called Muhammad Ghaus. It is
रैसुल्कामेलीन सुल्तानुल औलिया गॉस उल आलम ख्वाजा हाजी हमीदुद्दीन बिन खातीरुद्दीन अत्तारियुल शत्तारियुल उर्फ़ हज़रात मोहम्मद गॉस ग्वालिअरी (RAISULKAMELIN SULTANUL AULIA GAUS UL AALAM KHWAZA HAJI HAMMIDUDDIN BIN KHATIRUDDIN ATTARIYUL SHATTARIYUL Urf Hazrat Mohammed Gaus Gwaliory).
Contrast them with the धार्मिक saints like गौतम बुद्ध, महावीर, नामदेव, तुकाराम, गुरु रामदास, गुरु नानक, कबीर, तुलसीदास. I can still add a few names, and even then, the list will be shorter, then the name of a single sufi windbag.
The sufis had to rely on such fancy names to hide the hollowness of their creed.
True to the character of Sufis, this one was living in Gwalior fort and was providing inside information to Babur to attack the fort and establish Islam in the hitherto peaceful Gwalior. For his treachery to those who had allowed him to stay in Gwalior, and service to Babur, he has been mentioned in the memoirs of Babar i.e. Babarnama. That was in year 1527.
It is time we started telling the truth to one and all, while promoting the graves of these persons, which are sitting on demolished temples.
