If you have ever wondered about the ideology of 'Maoist' movement in our country, here are a few tit bits which leave no doubt that the real source of this gangsterism is not Maoism but an extension of the biggest organized criminal gang on the planet - The Church. These have been extracted from 'Maoist information bulletin', thus from their own mouthpiece. The bulletin contains terms like Muslims, Hindu, Christians and Shankaracharya.
Now, why would supposedly atheistic Maoists use religious terms. The aim becomes clear when one understands the implication of these words by the tone and tenor used. Let us take the words one by one.
The word Muslims appears only once in the 'bulletin'. It is...
This sympathy of 'Maoists' is not limited to Muslims. It spills over to Christians also, alongwith the hatred to Sanatan Dharm. Sample this:
Do you get the drift ??
The terrorists are all saffron and Hindus are all 'Hindu fascist'. Muslims are victims and Christians are also either victims or are important group.
The point is if these had been really maoists, they would have despised all the religious identities and not exaggerated them to target one particular religion. The real Maoism has died with Mao, just like Communism. The present maoism is just a fake prop of anti India forces.
So, next time you hear the term Maoists, you know who is pulling the strings. The foot soldiers of the Maoists do not even know that they are playing in the hands of fanatic Christians.
Now, why would supposedly atheistic Maoists use religious terms. The aim becomes clear when one understands the implication of these words by the tone and tenor used. Let us take the words one by one.
The word Muslims appears only once in the 'bulletin'. It is...
The votaries of fake democracy.....shamelessly talk of democracy even when 3000 Muslims are murdered in cold blood by the saffron terrorists in Gujarat.The sympathy for Muslims and hatred for Saffron is strange from a so called atheistic 'Maoistic' ideology. As for the exaggeration and fakeness of the number of muslim victims, which was less then 800, read here.
This sympathy of 'Maoists' is not limited to Muslims. It spills over to Christians also, alongwith the hatred to Sanatan Dharm. Sample this:
They cannot explain how a democracy allows some terrorists of the saffron variety to murder Christian men and rape womenThen again on page 37,
An important group which reached the tribal areas were the Christian missionaries who set up schools there followed by Hindu right-wing groups who decided that the tribals must be “saved” from the Christians.So far Now to the word Hindu in the report. It appears four times. One is mentioned above and the rest of the three are
Gandhi’s so called non-violence is meant for the poor, the oppressed, and the victims of feudal violence, imperialist violence, upper-caste violence, Hindu fascist violence, and structural violence in varied forms.and
In DK, the brutal state offensive had entered a new phase with the launching of the murderous terrorist armed campaign of salwa judum in June 2005 under the leadership of the Congress chieftain Mahendra Karma and the Hindu fascist Raman Singh government in Chhattisgarh.One more reference if from a news item of 'Hindustan Times'.
Do you get the drift ??
The terrorists are all saffron and Hindus are all 'Hindu fascist'. Muslims are victims and Christians are also either victims or are important group.
The point is if these had been really maoists, they would have despised all the religious identities and not exaggerated them to target one particular religion. The real Maoism has died with Mao, just like Communism. The present maoism is just a fake prop of anti India forces.
So, next time you hear the term Maoists, you know who is pulling the strings. The foot soldiers of the Maoists do not even know that they are playing in the hands of fanatic Christians.
